Climate as the Boogeyman
The United Nations warns: 50 countries will declare bankruptcy if the rich world does not help them
Climate, ya say?… “It’s the economy, dummy!”
Banking madam, Christine Lagarde, and an ECB constituent
The jigsaw puzzle starts here:
The Guardian, said, in a report published by Achim Steiner, Director of Global Development at the United Nations, and seen by Shafaq News Agency, "Inflation, the energy crisis and high interest rates create conditions in which an increasing number of countries are exposed to the risk of default, with possible repercussions." Meaning: disastrous for its people.
"There are currently 54 countries on our list of countries that are likely to default, and if we have more shocks - where prices go up more, the cost of borrowing, energy prices, food prices - it becomes almost inevitable that we will see a number of These economies are unable to pay." "This creates a catastrophic scenario - look at Sri Lanka - with all the social, economic and political implications that this has," -Achim Steiner, Director of Global Development at the United Nations
What is the cause or source of the aforementioned “energy crisis?” Perhaps it is evidence that the managers of the infrastructure, and the entire energy paradigm is flawed. If a system was working as a system—then all integral parts would neatly align to comprise a functioning whole. What we see is evidence of mismanagement, and the bureaucrats covering their hides. Covering up ‘what they hide from us’ is more apt.
There’s now too much evidence in plain sight to suggest I am theorizing—the conspiracy was, and is, to distract almost 8 billion humans from realizing the BANK has met its doom. All central banks around the globe are bankrupt, and no amount of climate fear will hide this fact.
The puzzle piece that attracts my curiosity has to do with the recent COP27 meeting in Egypt—the timing of it—and the timing of every other distraction currently circulating, from fear of nukes to demented politicians to projected food shortages. While minor distractions like Pelosi’s home intruder drama continue to fog the lens of the average US citizen, the Climate fog continues to reign supreme as the corporate media’s weekly narrative theme. Recently I noticed a little video blurb(haven’t watched it) re Greta Thunberg’s presumed re-branding as an activist of some sort. The players that exploited Greta may have created a monster that could turn on them I suppose…wait and see.
Now the UN comes to the US and EU crony capitalists with a request for financial support—and using the climate apocalypse scenario as the reason. Not that the historic collapse of the banking empire has anything to do with why these operators are trying to siphon cash out of the US treasury…yet again. Really?
This brings me to the premise for a brief inquiry: How much longer will “They” try to sell us on the climate change movie as the banks scramble to set up a new debt servitude racket? Granted—many sleepwalkers will avoid looking at the Beast, and continue to visit ATM’s as long as the machines spit out the funny money. I’ve followed a number of Monetary Reset reporters over the years, and I’ve also listened to the cabal’s very own appointed delegates such as Christine Lagarde(one shouldn’t ignore Lagarde—she speaks in code). For those who aren’t familiar with Ms Lagarde (the Guard?) her role as President of the European Central Bank since 2019, is a position of notable merit—especially in terms of her function as a Rothschild, Inc mouthpiece.
Prior to her job with the ECB, Lagarde was the director of the IMF. This is typical of the manner in which all the cronies within the eco-financial matrix make the rounds as board members and foundation think tank advisors. It’s a musical chair formula that keeps everything the same. Just going around in circles, as they amass greater wealth and sustain the powerbase’s structure,.i.e, Le Club.
Backtracking, I heard Ms Lagarde say in 2010, and ever so clearly— that we needed a monetary “reset.” Various whistleblowers have been telling us about the BANK and its scams and schemes and missing trillions for a decade or more—notable and informed professionals, like Karen Hudes (World Bank) or Catherine Austin Fitts (former assistant secretary for HUD under GHW Bush’s admin.) The foregone conclusion is that we humans have allowed Pirates to run the world and they own the BANK.
How do we fix this mess? I might refer to a number of authors who are not part of the Wef’er club, to include this title: Riane Eisler’s - “The Real Wealth of Nations”
This book review excerpt comes from Stanford Social Innovation Review:
“The Real Wealth of Nations tackles the dismal science of economics and proves conclusively that it deserves that description. Eisler wrestles conventional “wisdom” to the ground, challenging the assumptions that have supported the practice of business and economic policy for the last two centuries, since Adam Smith’s original Wealth of Nations. In contrast, Eisler prescribes a “caring economics” that assumes the obvious: people really matter. As she argues, “the real wealth of nations consists of the contributions of people and our natural environment.”
https://ssir.org/books/reviews/entry/review_the_real_wealth_of_nations
“Dismal science” indeed. The Harvard/Yale economics poobahs, ensconced in an ivory tower fortified and sustained by a Wall St casino racket—maintain their own power status within a decaying institutional milieu. They remain blind to the reality of authentic “economy of scale” functionality. Rigor mortis had set in around 1929, and the magic show with its mirrors and smokescreen has been part of a spectacular con job for a hundred years. Meanwhile, the wee hobbit folk are merely trying to live lives that are above the desperation level, while the Economystical poobahs live in gated communities with a private security force.
Defining a holistic eco-financial realm:
“Eisler’s contribution is to weave the environmental and feminist values into a cohesive approach – an economic theory that comes as close to the Native American ideal as contemporary society can manage: Every action must be considered in terms of its impact on the next seven generations.” -SSIR
Holistic vs “Sustainable” for Them
Eisler’s parameters for a holistic eco-financial model
The Real Wealth of Nations sets forth “six foundations for a caring economic system”:
(1) a “full-spectrum economic map” that encompasses the household, unpaid, natural, and illegal economies, as well as the traditional market and government economies;
(2) a set of cultural beliefs and institutions that shifts the reigning social paradigm from domination to partnership;
(3) caring economic rules, policies, and practices for business and government that meet basic human needs, direct technological developments to life-sustaining applications, and consider effects on future generations;
(4) inclusive and accurate economic indicators that reject benchmarks like the GDP, which grows larger with every massive oil spill and every bullet used in war;
(5) relationships between economic and social structures that don’t result in the concentration of economic assets and power at the top; and
(6) an evolving economic theory of what Eisler calls “partnerism”:
human interaction that goes beyond capitalism and socialism to recognize the essential economic value of caring for ourselves, others, and nature.
~Finis…for now. To be continued!
Resources for historical financial perspective—CA Fitts report from 2004:
America's Black Budget & the Manipulation of Mortgage & Financial Markets