Conspiracy 'Theories' are a Threat to Democracy
The U.N. sets the stage for global censorship
“Free speech is my right to say what you don't want to hear.”
— George Orwell
"Our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to hammer [disinformation] out of existence.”
— John Kerry
In consideration of the United Nation’s proposal to limit free speech, the outline below would most likely qualify as the sort of ‘conspiracy theory’ which the UN should report as a legitimate threat to our world’s peaceful and harmonious order—
UN-”Pact For The Future”-section 8:
…And who do we entrust with separating the wheat from the chaff when engaging our advanced skills of discernment? …Especially as we’ve witnessed a multi-layered global PSYOP that cannot be denied unless we adopt the ostrich as the symbol for our collective emotional IQ.
Exhibit (a)
J. Kerry:
“During the World Economic Forum’s 'Sustainable Development Impact Meetings' during last week's United Nations General Assembly in New York City, former Senator and Secretary of State John Kerry stated that the First Amendment is an impediment to governing the people as he sees fit.”—Sept. 29th—John Leake
‘Skull & Bonesman’, John Kerry, has deep (state) roots within the hallowed ranks of the DC club… [no theory here—just the facts!]
The next time the District of “Columbia” sends its televised coded message, just remember: there’s nothing to see, nothing to hear, and no cause for concern—even if a gang of thugs from Venezuela takes over the apartment complex where you pay rent.
Also, remember—Joe Biden does not suffer from any form of cognitive decline whatsoever; and Nancy Pelosi assures us that Kamala Harris was unanimously elected to her current post as a presidential candidate. Asking questions is just plain stupid— so just dumb down and get with the program! You’ll be happier, and probably own nothing.
We Saw it Coming, Didn’t We?
Most of the current conspiracies are are well-advanced beyond mere “theory” status. How can we test the conclusion that conspiracies are part of the reality-sphere?
A notable headline:
“Business School professor emerita says surveillance capitalism undermines autonomy — and democracy”
For one thing, we all know that the creation of a business plan often involves a very small group of individuals who conspire to make a profit on tech, or a service, or on a calculated timeline that will ensure a return on investment.
Every real estate salesperson knows that putting a house on the market in the Fall and Spring are the most advantageous seasons for a sale. That’s not a theory—that’s ‘street smarts.’ Just as a stock trader might use insider information to ‘short a stock’—say, on American Airlines, a day before 9/11. [Insert Disclaimer here: UN fact checkers want us to believe that the 9/11 airline stock trade thang is a conspiracy “theory” —and there are no indicators for nefarious shady deals when the WTF buildings collapsed in free fall— into their own footprint as if expertly executed as a controlled demolition using explosives at key structural inflection points… Even if someone did make a killing on short-selling ‘specific’ airline stocks prior to the collapse of the twin towers.]
As por moi—give me the conspiracy revelations straight, black-pilled, bitter, and sans sucre. Alas, one man’s truth may be another man’s nightmare. Denial is far easier to deal with anyhow.
We grok the UN’s message—no need to think or question why reality appears so f#@©¡d up! Just ask Siri or Alexa what to think and what to believe.
‘AI is your best friend. We know that AI is our best friend because the Silly-con Valley boys sold our governments on the econometrics of their program.’
To question the facts regarding a totalitarian-one-world-government-agenda is a dangerous proposition according to the UN definition for “disinformation” — even when our eyes-ears-and critical thinking processes tell us we’d better remain alert and question authority. Nonetheless, something about a history lesson having to do with cattle cars and holiday camps prompts one to question authority.
Weaponizing Language Requires Precision and Timing
Why not just agree that Lying is an art-form, and the best liars always pretend to tell the truth—and seem to get away with it. In order to proceed with the linguistic analysis of narratives, and the UN’s new legislation designed to protect us from disinformation, misinformation, and how to ignore the Podcasters who dwell on the phony[?] conspiracies that are a direct threat to democracy, we need a preface.
For many observers, and listeners— it appears as obvious that popular truth-seekers online are the reason why the MSM is losing viewers, which clearly represents a threat to the fiefdom of billionaire oligarchs such as Alex Soros, and Larry Fink.
‘It’s unfair I tell ya! …BlackRock™ deserves to own you, your house, your congressmen, and your DNA. They worked too many years to accumulate their wealth and power. Aw geez…give ‘em a little luv for goshsakes! …and what about a little extra for the shareholders?’
THE OPERATING LEXICON…
[the following is not a theory, the following terms are used day in-and day out by the “leaders” of the un-free world.]
Non Governmental Organizations = Zero Democracy
The ruse: “sustainable” means “zero-carbon emissions”, i.e., carbon reduction. Human beings are a carbon based entity; and in light of the roll out of the mRNA gene therapy drug, we may presume that altering human RNA was more than a mere experiment—it was a tactic. Does this sound Paranoid?
“Fool me once…”
The linguistic con-job
What is the definition of ‘Democracy’ that the NGO’s are using? The NGO’s don’t even operate as an enterprise based upon democratic elections. NGO’s are funded by oligarchs. Oligarch billionaires to be exact. Foundations created in the name of philanthropy fund the most powerful NGOs in the world. Thus we may presume that the oligarch’s definition of democracy is ‘the rule of (their) order’, or— ‘the best government that money can buy.’
Recently Alex Soros has been seen in action making the rounds as puppet master and economic insurance agent for the Technocratic overlords. Tim Walz bowed down to Alex, and the DEMs were funded once again by a globalist-oligarch. None of the oligarch-compliant political hacks care a wit about democracy. And Walz is no exception to this rule.
“Philanthropathic” Persuasion (i.e., “philanthropaths” exhibit anti-social, biophobic behavior)
Or call it ‘Con-trolling.’
We the People are trolled and monitored as statistics in a global program that uses terms like “economic sustainability”; “diversity & inclusion”; and the 1960’s term of that decade: “equal opportunity”—now repackaged as DEI.
A brief critique and sober analysis of these three areas which the NGOs and Foundations use as a fundraising mantra:
“Economic sustainability”: sustainable for whom, and for what enterprise in particular?
Let’s consider the Central Banking matrix as a lead player in how nation’s are “loaned” hundred’s of millions, or billions of dollars for projects that supposedly benefit the under-class in various “under-developed” or impoverished nations throughout the world. Nations that may have endured the ravages of war, and were plundered— resulting in broken infrastructure that formally worked efficiently, until the bombing began. Thus, what was once a functioning ‘economically stable’ national economy (‘stable’ is usually a relative term) became a target for predatory ‘agencies’ that usually wear the mask of NGO, such as the U.N.—as one example. [Libya is a prime example of a former functional economy annihilated by war. HRC was Secretary of State when that agenda was fulfilled. Libya’s leader, General Muammar Gaddafi, was not an ally of the Central Banksters, and was removed from power via murder.]
On the global stage, the principal benefactors in any money-laundering ruse are players like the World Bank, BIS, IMF, and the trail always leads back to the Davos HQ. The leading question remains a topic that might be labeled as a conspiracy-theory: who or what umbrella-entity owns the Bank(s)?
We now know that BlackRock™ is the primary conglomerate for every international corporation on the planet. We must then ask: what is the doctrine that directs the BlackRock™ agenda?
Perhaps the language of DEI mandates might reveal a few clues.
“Diversity & Inclusion”: ‘Inclusive’, meaning what exactly? …Inclusive of homeless US veterans who are of no further use to the military industry?…Inclusive of the US factory workers who’s jobs were farmed out to Mexico and China?
Enforcing the edicts of a DEI program, and creating a racial profile as a statistical measurement metric— in order to direct capital to a targeted sector— seems like a likely place for a money laundering operation, does it not? I mean—how much easier to employ the recent unemployed migrant-arrivals, who have been relocated throughout the world, while fulfilling the mandates of the DEI timetable. The migrants will also accept a lower minimal wage due to the levels of financial instability that they have left behind. “Everything’s Free in America!”— compliments of We the taxpayers.
Money Laundering 101—international eco-finance
In terms of financing made available for another country’s development: where does the money come from? Taxation for one thing.
Getting a loan from a Central Bank (or via an intermediary NGO as deal-broker) means those tax dollars become more valuable, especially as interest on the loans accrue. Control and power are maintained as the developing (war-ravaged) countries must beg for mercy in the form of investment capital that comes with strings attached. That’s been a scam of banksters for centuries. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is a notorious front-man for the scam. [a ‘scam’ couldn’t possibly suggest a ‘conspiracy’ could it?]
Meanwhile, the uneducated and unemployed migrants (often desperate, and/or drug cartel gang members) represent a new breed of potential worker-chattel units, ripe for exploitation. The woke DEI minions pretend to care about the poor migrants—characterized as: victims that are trying to escape from war-ravaged countries that were infiltrated by drug lords, and the spooks from Langley. Aye—there’s the rub.
“Equal opportunity”: what types of ‘opportunities’ are we speaking of?
Who among us has made efforts to start a small business—regardless of race, creed, color of skin, religion, or educational degree? Does ‘equal opportunity’ include having access to the capital needed to start a small business?
Consider the first step after the business plan and financial templates have been formulated. The location for the business must be rented or bought. Who owns the building, or the land, and what are the estimated property taxes? And assuming some type of business loan might be necessary, what are the terms for repayment of the ‘start-up’ loan? If the business fails (as many do) what assurances does the entrepreneur have which protect the primary lease-holder and investor? Forming an LLC will protect a business owner’s personal property if the business fails; and yet— this is not going to provide any guarantees for starting a future business enterprise.
As one example of how the current financial program works, Warren Buffet often appears on the skeptic’s radar. The opportunities he seized is a textbook example of how certain entrepreneurs are more equal than others.
In the simplest terms: once you’ve made millions of dollars, money will become available as if by magic. In Buffet’s example; he was able to get a government loan of $180 million bucks, with a spectacular proviso for repayment,i.e., he won’t have to make repayments on the loan until he is 110 years of age. The business he acquired? —“Geico.”
Buffet bought an Insurance Co, which is a no-brainer as far as money-making machines go, complete with repeat customers billed monthly. Surely he understood actuarial tables— and the probability that he wouldn’t live to see his 110th birthday.
Buffet’s example begs the question: How are we ordinary folks able to access ‘equal opportunities’ if we are not already millionaires or billionaires?
Lesson learned: Language and specific legal terminology is a battleground for lawyers, and corporate enterprise. Affording a good lawyer is another layer in how to live like Royalty or as another billionaire oligarch.
Corporate oligarchy, or ‘monetary elitism’, are a more accurate description of the ‘order of rules’ aka “rules-based order”, that the Plutocrats maintain. Apparently power has gone to their heads and we are merely an annoyance at this stage in their endgame plans. There’s a reason the Black Nobility is associated with the ‘black’ arts (black magick), and no coincidence that Macchiavelli wrote the manual on cloak and dagger political tactics. Again—no conspiracy theory is suggested, just another history lesson.
I realize that I have commented on these observations before, as many other writer-observers have on Substack. Now that the cats outta da bag, we need to address next steps as we negotiate with each other about the world we choose to co-create. No need to consider negotiating with the enemy—because ‘Their way’ is the only way they will agree to consider. The lack of dialog between the workers of the world (aka debt slaves) and ruling elite is met with a deafening silence, and the complicity of a *pro elitist-media that is no longer a Free Press of, for, or by the People. [*UN says: ‘Conspiracy THEORY Alert’—Warning!!!!]
Before we might conspire to overturn a global con’s piracy, we need to look at the latest chapter in the endgame. The UN is playing a big hand at present. But before we move forward with the UN doctrine for the 21st Dystopian Century, a review of the roots of the “United-Nations” warrants consideration.
One most obvious clue has to do with the name: ‘United Nations.’ At first glance we think: It’s a good thing to see the nations of the world working together to create world peace and prosperity for the poor and down trodden. And yet, now that we’ve heard the plans for SMART cities; vaxx mandates; synthetic meat; cricket diets; trans-gender-education (transhuman indoctrination); phony climate related legislation (carbon-tax); and the end of individualism and national identities—we might see how united-nations suggests, ‘One-World-Government.’
From The League of Nations to the United Nations
In this brief synopsis the Rockefeller name appears yet again. If there is one family bloodline that has shaped the political spectrum of the US beyond any other, it is certainly “Rockefeller.” In essence: Pirates wear nice suits and create foundations.
What’s a “foundation?” answer: The first stage of construction when building an ideological framework for governance (i.e., control).
The following comes from-Connecting The Agenda, published in 2016—
“First, it should be noted that the organization that preceded the United Nations, the League of Nations, received a significant amount of support from Rockefeller related organizations. In 1927, John D. Rockefeller Jr. provided the League of Nations with $2 million to "enhance its international relations library and promote peace through knowledge and understanding". This Library of the League of Nations later became known as the United Nations Office at Geneva (UNOG) when the league transferred its assets to the United Nations. According to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, in a statement praising the Rockefeller family's past and present support of international organizations, the interest from that original $2 million loan still provides approximately $150,000 every biennium to the United Nations.
The Rockefeller Foundation was also heavily involved with transition from the League of Nations to the United Nations as documented in the article "The Rockefeller Foundation and the Transition from the League of Nations to the UN" by Ludovic Tournes of the University of Geneva. Further connections could be drawn between the Rockefellers and the League of Nations but for the sake of brevity, we will move on to the United Nations.”
“The United Nations fits well into the Rockefeller family goal ‘to build a more integrated global political and economic structure-one world’. Through United Nations programs such as Agenda 21, local decision making power is being eroded and being replaced by regional governments that continue to become more centralized. In the analysis titled "The Problems with Connecticut Climate Change Policy - Part 4: The Rockefeller Connection", the connections between Agenda 21, the Rockefellers, and current events taking place in Connecticut are detailed. Through these connections a pattern emerges of a system being created that is designed to reduce the decision making power of individual towns, cities, and states, transferring that power over to large, centralized, non-elected bureaucracies.”
The Godfather of a Dynasty—
If David Rockefeller was alive today, he’d be very pleased with the UN “Pact For The Future.” And that’s no conspiracy theory—that’s an example of inductive reasoning and a plausible conclusion based on a review of Rockefeller’s history.
It becomes tiresome watching all the Rockefeller minions Babylon-ing on and on about safety, democracy, and the continuous assertions made regarding the threats posed by Donald Trump. Obviously we are being conned as usual, and We don’t matter— because [insert drum roll here] …We are not in Their Club!
Below: A beaming David Rockefeller, exuding his great love for humanity in all of its miraculous diversity—
Until next time…wishing Us well…and praying for a restored Republic!
Further reading:
How Billionaire Foundations Fund NGOs to Advance US Foreign Policy Goals
Also:
Congress Must Stop Biden’s Misuse of U.S. Foreign Aid to Impose His Radical Social Agenda on the World
https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/116508/documents/HHRG-118-GO06-20231025-SD004.pdf
Acknowledgments:
Kitchen Surveillance Cartoon—Who What Why
Discernment AKA reading between the lines. We need to get back to constitutional politics. Gonna be hard w all these shithead one world types. Im trying to be positive thats the only way i think.
"Weaponizing Language Requires Precision and Timing"
And the weaponizing of language requires control by the left of the mass media. The MSM is the weapon that has enable the left of winning the Long March.