Pfizer’s own trial data showed that more people died in the treatment group than the control group. Instances of heart attacks were up by 400% in the treatment group if I recall. So it’s no surprise to me that all cause mortality is higher, Pfizer knew it would be when they rolled out the shots. Anyone who looked at the data would have known what was going to happen.
Yes, we need to be picky!--there are many nuances to the dialog.What we do know is that Eco-Health Alliance weaponized some sort of viral agent(a SARS variant) at the Wuhan lab. That's about it. And we also know that respiratory ailments can be fatal depending on whether a person has pre-existing conditions. Otherwise, medical malpractice is still responsible for people dying ahead of schedule.
I appreciate the detailed response. We do need more dialog like this. I am also on the same track with 5G and nano-graphene resonances and the whole EMF enchilada. There is absolutely no doubt in my sense of truth that this entire PsyOp was a multi-faceted-multi dimensional tsunami.
Pfizer’s own trial data showed that more people died in the treatment group than the control group. Instances of heart attacks were up by 400% in the treatment group if I recall. So it’s no surprise to me that all cause mortality is higher, Pfizer knew it would be when they rolled out the shots. Anyone who looked at the data would have known what was going to happen.
...except, of course, that there's no way to test positive for CV-19, since it hasn't yet be isolated from the rest of creation.... (picky me)
Yes, we need to be picky!--there are many nuances to the dialog.What we do know is that Eco-Health Alliance weaponized some sort of viral agent(a SARS variant) at the Wuhan lab. That's about it. And we also know that respiratory ailments can be fatal depending on whether a person has pre-existing conditions. Otherwise, medical malpractice is still responsible for people dying ahead of schedule.
OK, fine, I'll be picky. We know that Eco-Health Alliance SAID it weaponized something, and probably spent a LOT of our regressive tax dollars, possibly to lend verisimilitude to their story. Arthur Firstenberg has written a book (INVISIBLE RAINBOW) about how flu is detoxing from too much EMF or radiation. Respiratory distress caused by EMFs can be greatly exacerbated by severe air pollution. Deadly medical protocols can be...deadly. But nobody YET has actually isolated any new "virus" from anyone sick from the alleged new disease: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/68-health-science-institutions-globally-all-failed-to-cite-even-1-record-of-sars-cov-2-purification-by-anyone-anywhere-ever/ And Stephan Lanka has proven that the entire field of virology is fraud: https://dokumen.pub/wissenschafftplus-magazin-the-virus-misconception-part-2-the-beginning-and-the-end-of-the-corona-crisis-2-02-2020nbsped.html
I appreciate the detailed response. We do need more dialog like this. I am also on the same track with 5G and nano-graphene resonances and the whole EMF enchilada. There is absolutely no doubt in my sense of truth that this entire PsyOp was a multi-faceted-multi dimensional tsunami.