"FBI Says 'No Credible Threats in U.S.'—And The Media Backs Them"
....An Analysis of 'Newspeak' in 2023
I’m re-publishing parts of this Canada Free Press article due to its relevant inferences regarding ‘narrative control’. The other reason is that the irony and contradictions inherent in the report’s inferences pertaining to the FBI’s intelligence acumen might suggest that the agency has reached its dysfunctional apex. If any FBI-hired media monitors wish to scrutinize this particular statement, I would suggest that Hippocratic wisdom may apply: “Physician heal thyself.”
Note to J. Edgar Hoover’s ghost: House cleaning is in order!
Before we begin, it may be useful to consider the Orwellian ministries featured in George Orwell’s prophetic novel, “1984.”
IRONY POINT- NUMERO UNO—Canada Free Press reports…
Islamic “global day of Jihad”
“Big Problem is that the FBI, under the Obama-controlled Biden administration doesn’t see Islamic terrorists in the same way as citizens and victims do.
The FBI seems more interested in doing Dem duty in referring to parents of school children as “domestic terrorists” and spying on traditional Catholics attending Holy Mass.
“Few media are warning the masses that Hamas has called for an Islamic “global day of Jihad” today, Friday the 13th of October, 2023.”—Canada Free Press
During the BLM riots (May 28th, 2020) that led to the burning down of churches and small business owner-operated corner grocery stores, the FBI was oddly off-duty; or merely busy hushing up Hunter’s laptop controversy?
Fast forward—January 6th, 2021
When the J6 “insurrection” (so-called by the Democrats and Media in general) occurred, a man named Ray Epps was rallying the citizens to go into the Capitol—with no interference or objections from F.B.I. agents or Capitol Police.
Who is Ray Epps?
Epps is reportedly a former member of the ‘Oath Keepers’ and also an ex-marine. In terms of the plot line and discrepancies regarding the allegations of Epps as an agent provocateur, Tucker and Fox was the subject of a defamation lawsuit when Epps was making efforts to disassociate from the conspiracy allegations:
The Guardian reported: “Asked about efforts to “paint you as this instigator”, citing his own actions and messages, Epps said: “There was an effort to make me a scapegoat.”
Earlier this year, Dominic Pezzola, a member of the far-right Proud Boys group who was ultimately sentenced to 10 years in prison for his part in the riot, invoked the Epps conspiracy theory while testifying in court.”
Footnote on Epps:
After most of the corporate media narratives righteously defended their protestations that Epps was definitely not an agent provocateur, nor an FBI stooge—
Epps was then convicted for “disorderly and disruptive” behavior (insert slap on wrist here) on January 6th —the narrative spin introduced which eliminates the ‘agent provocateur’ allegations once and for all!
The Hill reported:
“Since the Capitol attack, Epps has become the focus of conspiracy theories that allege he was a federal agent who instigated violence that day to tarnish other rioters.
During the hearing Wednesday, Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Gordon read a statement into the record due to the “unusual nature of the case” that affirmed Epps “was not before, during or after” the Capitol riot “a confidential source or an undercover agent for the government, the FBI, DHS or any law enforcement.”
And yet…
“Epps, 62, admitted to engaging in disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds after storming the Capitol, falsely claiming the 2020 presidential election had been stolen. He appeared before the court over Zoom, calling in from home with his wife while wearing a black suit and gray tie.
As part of Epps’s plea agreement, the government agreed not to prosecute him further in connection with the Capitol attack. Epps agreed for his social media to be reviewed by law enforcement and to pay $500 in restitution.
He faces up to one year in prison, though the sentencing guidelines for his offense range from zero to six months. His sentencing is scheduled to take place virtually Dec. 20.” —The Hill
In my perception of Newspeak filters, ‘The Hill’ has always toed the line for the establishment running the show in D.C. It’s not so much what they report- as much as the interjections of biased contextual statements. In my view, The Hill is just another narrative maintenance device of the deep state.
The nagging detail that the renowned journalist, Sharyl Attkisson, recently alluded to has to do with how there is still no legitimate investigation into the actors-agents-or provocateurs who may have plausibly been involved with the J6 insurrection event.
In retrospect, the timing of the J6 event, and the media’s handling of what was not an insurrection in reality, led to the arrests of many innocent attendees (an estimated 1100 arrests thus far) who were there to hear Trump speak.
First Amendment rights be damned!
What was simply—a rally attended mostly by law-abiding concerned citizens—was reinterpreted by the corporate media as a dangerous riot. The Democrats on the far left trumpeted the usual rhetoric about the “threats to Democracy” and so forth, and the F.B.I. seemingly went along for the ride.
And now, in 2023, Hamas and its radical imam instigators are calling for Jihad in order to initiate further chaos in the world as Earth’s citizens undergo a global economic Reset; but there is no threat— according to the F.B.I. Meanwhile, Blinken and his State Department are busy retracting politically volatile statements almost as if they realize the Armageddon narratives aren’t considered a reality for all the US citizens who understand that we are being played…yet again.
Friday the 13th came and went, and we didn’t witness a Jihad on the streets or on the TV screens. At least not here in the US—and I doubt in any other country either. In France, workers are angry and filling the streets in a mass protest for higher wages. The French worker’s furor has zero to do with Hamas or Israeli political agendas, people simply wish to thrive and live a prosperous life. Follow the money!
Meanwhile Back in the USA—
When it comes to our representative’s safety concerns, Politico reported:
I suppose the F.B.I. management team must’ve received a few emails from our Representatives with regard to perceived threats to our nation’s security by now. And yet…it feels like another geo-engineered storm in a teacup.
THE GRAND IRONY
There are “No Credible Threats in the US”, so says the FBI.
But wait…
What if the FBI is no longer working for the American people? …Might this possibility represent a ‘legitimate threat’ to the nation’s integrity and adherence to Constitutional Law?
[insert crickets]
What if certain intel operatives and agents within the nation’s Intel communities pose a threat to the Republic and constitutional integrity?
What if chaos-generating operatives are stoking all manner of divisive tactical events and narratives in order to destroy what remains of the embattled former Republic?
Here’s one consideration that pertains to the Obama legacy:
Fast forward to today’s Oct. 15th, 2023 Canada Free Press inquiry:
January 6, 2021: Precursor to America’s Third Civil War?
“The January 6, 2021, Capitol Insurrection may be the precursor to a Third American Civil War. The segue into it would see a similar three-way division of the population as occurred during the American Revolution. One group senses the telltale odor of self-serving lies and deception from those in charge; another operates with an uncompromising and imperious self-righteousness, while those in the middle just want to get by.” —Lee Cary, CFP
III. Jan. 6th “Insurrection”…?
It seems that ‘threats from within’ are certainly a consideration worthy of deeper scrutiny. Does the term, “infiltration” strike a chord of familiarity?
What about the members of the corporate press who continually fabricate narratives aligned with powerful BigTech and Pharma interests? This sort of narrative manipulation appears as an authentic threat to the nation’s overall health, security, and liberty for its residents.
And yet—there are no visible ‘threats’ according to the F.B.I.
No visible threats— just insidious woke indoctrination and leftists drumming for totalitarian surveillance-state governance ideals. Or just more F.B.I. agents monitoring angry parents who protest a school’s use of scandalous and inappropriate textbooks designed to justify the cause for genital mutilation and transhumanism.
a few resources:
https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/in-1984-what-are-the-four-ministries-and-their-152241#
cool Art Prints:
https://www.sethinsua.com/product-page/ministry-of-truth-1984
https://www.redbubble.com/i/art-print/Ministry-of-truth-by-ChloeArtCr11/112485991.DJUF3
Editor's note: As a general principle I allow for rancorous debate in any adult dialog--whether here on Substack or elsewhere. However--when expletives show up I choose to exercise an editor's right to delete anything that may disengage dialog and detract from intelligent repartee. I see no good purpose in introducing further mayhem into what is already a chaotic state of cognitive dysfunction. Our society is divided, but it's not along party lines--at least not in how I am witnessing this event. The 'division' I'm witnessing is the insidious result of a MSM propaganda machine and very dark powerbrokers with unlimited cash reserves.[consider how Fauci lied with the complicit support of MSNBC, CNN, NPR--and served billion-dollar Pharma interests] To some folks, criticizing status quo elements in the Press may sound like so much manure; however, to my way of looking at the disintegration of the Fourth Estate, 'fertilizer' may be useful when allowing for the questioning of authorities who choose to cancel and censor alternative views. If anyone has a problem with a term, or a word(such as "traditional"), or any 'presumption' regarding politics or religion, then I welcome level-headed scrutiny of the semantic inferences or areas of dispute. Again--if we get bogged down in semantic disputes regarding a term such as "traditional", or matters of opinion about how a Catholic or any other religious group is interpreted and defined, we get lost in the weeds... The weeds of self-righteous posturing and ego importance. A further note of interest: Trudeau (or Castrudeau) passed legisltaion in Canada to block alternative news sites online (that are unfriendly to the ruling state agenda). Canada Free Press was indeed blocked via algorithmic censor tools compliments of the G00gle police(CFP engaged Lawfare, and I believe were successful with their legal battles).
Also--for the record--the MSM here in the US has been suggesting the idea of "holy wars" or "civil war" with an obvious bias--as if there is the desire to further erode any semblance of unity and genuine response-ability of participating citizens that are involved in the quest for healing a very sick nation. 'PsyOps disease' needs the aid and support of all those who care about a future of humanity; and this also includes allowing for the alternative views and opinions of internet journalists. Orwell did get it right! ...tis a most unfortunate thing that he was so accurate.