HIVE MIND BLIND

Reality Shapers vs 20/20 Vision

Jan 19, 2023

Social engineering —in ‘America’ and the world, is a reality. It has been since the last century. Edward Bernays(1891-1995) was one of the chief progenitors. Bernays was Sigmund Freud’s nephew. Bernay’s observations of human behavior, especially relevant to consumer spending patterns, became the textbook template for future advertising campaigns.

Edward Bernays-godfather of psychology as a sales tool

Britannica states: “After World War I, Bernays and Doris Fleischman (1891–1980), whom he later married, opened their own public relations office. Their first clients included the U.S. War Department, which wanted to persuade businesses to hire returning war veterans, and the Lithuanian government, which was lobbying for recognition by the United States. For one client, Venida hairnets, Bernays publicized the danger of women workers’ wearing long, loose hair in factories and restaurants. As a result, several U.S. states passed laws requiring factory workers and female food-service employees to wear hairnets. He organized soap-carving competitions for the Ivory soap of his client Procter & Gamble.”

A vigorous spokesman and advocate for public relations into his 90s, Bernays was the author of many books, among the most influential of which were Crystallizing Public Opinion (1923), Propaganda (1928), and Public Relations (1952). He edited The Engineering of Consent (1955), the title of which is his oft-quoted definition of public relations.”

MAD AVE

Madison Ave predates the Langley experiments in Laurel Canyon, and all other LSD induced pop culture productions. Engineering consent has been an ongoing cultural PsyOp—right up to mask & jab mandate experiments.

Pop Music as a Vehicle

“…Zappa never really made a secret of the fact that he had nothing but contempt for the “hippie” culture that he helped create and that he surrounded himself with. By numerous accounts, he was a rigidly authoritarian control-freak and a supporter of U.S. military actions in Southeast Asia. As a ringmaster who always wanted to be in control he never used drugs.

Zappa’s father Francis also had little regard for the youth culture of the 1960s. He was a chemical warfare specialist assigned to – the Edgewood Arsenal. Edgewood is the longtime home of America’s chemical warfare program, as well as a facility frequently cited as being deeply enmeshed in MK-ULTRA operations. Curiously enough, Frank Zappa literally grew up at the Edgewood Arsenal, having lived the first seven years of his life in military housing on the grounds of the facility. The family later moved to Lancaster, California, near Edwards Air Force Base, where Francis Zappa continued to busy himself with doing classified work for the military/intelligence complex. His son, meanwhile, prepped himself to become an icon of the peace and love crowd.”

Also of interest—Frank’s wife, Gail Zappa, known formerly as Adelaide Sloatman, hails from a long line of career Naval officers, including her father, who spent his life working on classified nuclear weapons research for the U.S. Navy. Gail herself had once worked as a secretary for the Office of Naval Research and Development.

It strikes me as synonymous with Woke culture that the Peace&Love pablum churned out in the tabloid press during the 1960’s is similar to the Woke version of Rainbows&Unicorns promoted in the 1990’s through the year 2000 and 20 years hence. In essence, both periods of time and the pop culture as presented via the TV media and printed press were inauthentic and more a matter of journalists reporting on a purported organic cultural trend and acting as the actual ‘purveyors of the trend.’ The magazines and photos of Woodstock were useful and served a purpose in terms of promoting the narrative of the era. Social engineering is just a means to an end.

Coca-Cola ( a notorious operational front for the Langley clowns) saturated the airwaves with the following pablum at the height of the groovy Hippie charade:

This brings us face to face with “Cancel Culture-Bolshevism”—or the mind games of our present era. Hive-Mind-Techno-Statism and the Techno-Religious order of these times is the defining cultural trend. And this brings us to Stanford University’s attempt to shape the narrative and define what is acceptable language within the technocrat’s social engineering program. In evidence—from Stanford’s management:

“The initiative's scope of ‘racist terminology in technology’ was later expanded more broadly as "harmful language in technology.”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11558067/Woke-Stanford-University-publishes-list-harmful-language-want-eliminate.html

Stanford University Attempts To Ban ‘Harmful’ Words, List Includes ‘American’

Stanford University IT released an index of “harmful language” that it recommends be erased from the school’s websites. The list includes the terms “American” and “Hispanic.”

The list is a product of the “Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative,” which aims to “eliminate” words that may be deemed “racist, violent, and biased,” the document reads. The index lists a wide variety of words — some of which are commonly used — and provides an alternative word and an explanation of why the language may be harmful.

There are ten “harmful language” sections outlined in the document including: ableist, ageism, colonialism, culturally appropriate, gender-based, and biased (e.g., disability bias, ethnic bias, ethnic slurs, gender bias, implicit bias, sexual bias) language.

The list recommends banning the term “American” and replacing it with “U.S. Citizen,” as it reportedly implies that the U.S. is the “most important country in the Americas.”

“This term [American] often refers to people from the United States only, thereby insinuating that the US is the most important country in the Americas (which is actually made up of 42 countries),” the list reads.

https://dailycaller.com/2022/12/20/stanford-university-list-banned-words-american/

Stanford University Releases List of ‘Harmful’ and ‘Racist’ Words to Eliminate – Including ‘American,’ ‘Grandfather,’ and ‘Long Time, No See’

Oops:

Stanford pulls ‘Harmful Language' list amid backlash

In January, the IT affinity group released another statement, saying the initiative was “catalyzed” by events at the national and campus level during 2020, adding that it was created “by and for” the IT community as a guide, not a mandate.

EHLI was created to address racist terms historically used in IT, such as "master" and "slave" to describe aspects of systems. The initiative's scope of "racist terminology in technology" was later expanded more broadly as "harmful language in technology." It was this expansion in scope that is at the heart of the intense recent feedback from the Stanford community and beyond.
Steve Gallagher, Chief Information Officer, Stanford University

Example of a predecessor to the mind control experiments in the 1960’s:

John Marks describes it: “In 1947 the National Security Act created not only the CIA but also the National Security Council – in sum, the command structure for the Cold War. Wartime [Office of Strategic Services] leaders like William Donovan and Allen Dulles lobbied feverishly for the Act. Officials within the new command structure soon put their fears and their grandiose notions to work. Reacting to the perceived threat, they adopted a ruthless and warlike posture toward anyone they considered an enemy – most especially the Soviet Union. They took it upon themselves to fight communism and things that might lead to communism everywhere in the world.” Fear for sale.

And yet, today—the communist promo is in full bloom, with the DNC carrying the Maoist flag. Go figure. So many distractions, and so little free time.

eScapeGoats & Digital Realities

Discussion about this post