Definition of Holocaust:
holocaust |ˈhäləˌkôst, ˈhōlə-|
noun
1 destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, esp. caused by fire or nuclear war: a nuclear holocaust | the threat of imminent holocaust.
• (the Holocaust) the mass murder of Jews under the German Nazi regime during the period 1941–45. More than 6 million European Jews, as well as members of other persecuted groups, such as gypsies and homosexuals, were murdered at concentration camps such as Auschwitz.
2 historical a Jewish sacrificial offering that is burned completely on an altar.
ORIGIN Middle English: from Old French holocauste, via late Latin from Greek holokauston, from holos ‘whole’ + kaustos ‘burned’ (from kaiein ‘burn’).
Illustration: Aztec Priest and human sacrifice
Sacrifice, destruction, slaughter—are all attributes of a “holocaust.” At the most esoteric level, we may look at the spectacle of mass genocide as a sacrifice. If we delve deeply into the historical evidence for any ritualistic human sacrifice we’ll find accounts that disturb and fascinate while prompting a sane person to ask—why?
Why would a parent sacrifice their children in accord with a religious decree? Why would a parent sacrifice a child in accord with a governmental mandate? Why would we agree to negate the value of human life in deference to the dictates of scientism or fear? And yet, we’ve witnessed this cult-ural phenomenon in the guise of a mass-induced delusional decision to embrace euthanasia as if it’s necessary or desirable. We’ve been sold an un-truth that there are too many of us useless eaters. Depopulation is necessary for the planet’s survival, etc.
Whether we agree with the plan to reduce human population or not, it’s still an embedded thought form in mind. Informed and intelligent people may even joke about this ongoing program that chugs along and takes form as G20 meetings or insidious forms of public school and university curriculum adjustments. I am now considering the idea that there is an errant form of AI digital interference that has been operational on planet Earth for millennia; and this Beastly thing doesn’t necessarily consider humans as a desirable lifeform. This is not an orginal idea by any stretch of my imagination alone—many science fiction authors have explored this premise. The relevant detail from where I stand has to do with the avoidance and denial of an ugly topic that we need to address before the nation and world agree that the pandemic PsyOp is truly over, or was just a little bump in the road.
Elephants in the Living Room and Workplace
The precursor to the contemporary definition of holocaust is found in the Greek term—holokauston. Brittanica: The word Holocaust is derived from the Greek holokauston, a translation of the Hebrew word ʿolah, meaning a burnt sacrifice offered whole to God. [For those who are curious, we could spin off into a lengthy exploration of the term “God”—or is it “Yahweh”, the wrathful god?]
In terms of the Nazi ideology, the Jewish people were targeted as the cause of disease and the ills of German society. In an economical context—the Jewish people were incarcerated as a useful slave workforce for the work camps that provided material for the German war effort. As US Major General, Smedley Butler wrote, “War is a Racket.” Today in the US, many young black men work for the prison slave camps that provide free labor for US companies. This is not to say that the problems of slavery are not in the truest sense a manifestation of class and caste, or perceived “Elite” status. Hegemony is still the problem. Crime still pays the best dividends to the crime bosses. Slavery and debt servitude are forms of human sacrifice that are rarely seen as the real disease within society. Call it an invisible disease. Just as cancer is far more accurately defined as an “epidemic” than covid ever was.
In order to cure any disease we have to rigorously diagnose the causes of the malady. This brings us back to prevention and what it means to be well. Well-Being needs to be understood as something more than a simplistic presumption regarding ‘roof overhead and a good job’ —while human health is not merely part of a global economic engine(even if the WHO may try to sell us on the idea of fake healthcare as a tyrant’s dream come true).
Here we are, three years and counting, into the media-induced drama of an epic population control event. Those who deny that the covid vaccination ritual is a sacrificial genocidal event have chosen to live in ignorance. The evidence for this ritualistic event is on display to all but the blind. This chosen “blindness’ is a form of holocaust denial.
Meantime, a counter-intel event is also on display— defined as: those that deny that Covid was an actual pandemic are the holocaust deniers. This inversion of the truth is gaslighting, once again. We humans who tell the truth from a perspective of conveying forensic evidence and critical analysis—such as reporting data regarding young people who develop myocarditis after injection— are accused of spreading false information. Thus, “Gaslighting” is the trending weaponized term for our time.
I might suggest that we (as a society) are also suffering from a type of mental holocaust in the sense that we have entered a time when basic logic and common sense have been replaced by toxic thoughtforms characterized as PC or Woke formulaic constructs—in effect: mind control perception tools.
Is it any mystery that the WEF has a division called “Global Shapers?” Anyone who’s seen the film- “The Matrix”, knows what perception-shaping is. Anyone who has explored the realm of hallucinogens knows that perceptions of reality can be transformed. It is common knowledge that the Langley research team created a program many have heard of today, i.e., MK Ultra. It is also a known fact that LSD was part of the experimental mind-control program. Nowadays, the experiments during the 1960’s seem primitive compared with the hi-tech mind control versions involving nanoparticles and microwaves, or scalar weaponry. Want to control reality perception? …Just use Android screens, FB/Meta/Tweets/Instagram/TikTok, and a chip implant. Voilà!
As a digression, Art in its many forms is a tool and an ally for any human being who is dedicated to living in the Now. A film like “The Matrix” is both instructional and revelatory as well as serving as a tool. Those of us who are reasonably up-to-date with terms like pLandemic, or my personal fave—“Scam-demic”, know that the WEF Global Reset handbook stated that a pandemic would be a handy lubricant for introducing a new form of Global government. Consider the idea that the pLandemic was mental lube, and we were psychologically abused. The use of the pandemic fear porn show was diabolically manipulative— and, in retrospect, transparent as hell. And as a further redundancy, lest we lose sight of the precedents—the WEF and Davos Central Bank are joined at the hip. BANK and RESET go hand in glove, but without the TLC.
What about the sacrifice angle? What the hell is going on here?
The observers and researchers that have explored the history of sacrifice or religious ritual will tell us that there is an energetic exchange involved. In a simplistic sense, we are looking at a victim/predator tango. In popular literary terms: Vampirism. I have never felt comfortable with the role of victim—from a young age. When I have witnessed anyone being victimized it has brought forth feelings of rage or nausea. Or, nauseous rage, and feelings of righteous indignation and empathy for the person that has been victimized. Dramatic films depicting these sorts of scenarios affect all but those lacking empathy.
Note: I find it most interesting that the bat was used as the symbol for the spread of CV-19…coincidence?
When we allow the victim's role to persist we are in effect condemning an individual or society at large to a prison sentence as a perpetual victim. We are party to the crime, hence the sense of nausea. We look in the mirror and we see a coward. If we look in the mirror and see nothing, then we are living in Bram Stoker’s world.
We also accept the false notion that we have little power to challenge the jailers and designers of an artificial prison. We have negated our authentic role as creators of our collective paradigm and shunned our role as pioneers who may make extraordinary contributions to society and the world. Seeing requires an open mind.
I am reminded that in esoteric spiritual teachings (and in fact, also a scientific area of study) it is considered a reality that intelligence is located in the human heart and not the brain. Then again, linear thinkers in the academic neuroscience milieu may believe that the human brain is hackable and therefore pliable as a manipulated organ—heart or no heart. This seems like Doctor Frankenstein fare when we compart-mentalize the entirety of human life as if comparable to an auto engine.
Physician heal thyself—and please ‘have a heart!’
This is the fact that we have to deal with in healing a cultural wound:
Collectively, we accepted a scenario for a pandemic PsyOp and many people accepted the idea of an experimental trial of a sketchy drug— and therefore, embraced a holocaust. I am speaking of a vast majority of humans on the planet who obeyed the mask mandates and the lockdown protocols. Many of us suspected a ruse when we’d gone beyond the period of “flattening the curve”(the curve was flattened in 2020) and yet mandates and ridiculous rules were still in force; and too many people still wear masks when driving alone or walking their dogs today, in 2022.
Those of us who have either awakened to the ruse or that are now ready to heal the wound, and are putting denial to rest, are ready to accept responsibility for the next step.
And yet—what must we do to fully acknowledge that we were victimized and that a crime was committed? What steps are necessary in order to fully and authentically embrace who We are in the best sense of ethical integrity?
This is what came into mind:
First— we must acknowledge that there is an elephant in the room.
Second—that healing is necessary and desirable.
Third—that we choose to ignore the dictates of tyrants and criminals.
Fourth—that we choose to create alternatives to false ideas and scientism and instead choose to regard truth and real science and facts as our guideposts.
Fifth—that we create a manifesto for a community intention that is founded within a greater context for the greatest good. “Good” is real—just as “Evil” is obvious.
No semantic fakery or debate is useful or desirable when defining the “Greatest Good.” It’s obvious when we are deluded and/or thrown off course when it comes to fair and unfair, just or unjust.
We know intuitively what is right.
And we also know when something smells fishy…
More evidence:
ADDENDUM: Sharyl Attkisson’s Review of Died Suddenly-
*Attkisson Review-Died Suddenly
Excerpt: “The film takes a unique and effective approach. Instead of focusing on the stories of the vaccine-injured, which are subjects of other documentaries and features, it profiles accounts from well-reputed embalmers and funeral directors.
One reason this is so effective is that it manages to circumvent the controlled and propagandized environment of establishment medicine and doctors. Embalmers and funeral directors are typically not subject to the same threats of discipline, discrediting, and job loss as medical personnel at hospitals and in other establishment scenarios-- at least, not the same level. Embalmers also have not been targeted for control by the pharmaceutical industry.” [italics my own-RTT]
Embalmers have not been targeted for control—YET.
***************
ADDENDUM-11/27/22:
How The Covid-19 Vaccine Injected Billions Into Big Pharma—And Made Its Executives Very Rich
Note to Self: suggested film for review— “Schindler’s List.”
The title of your essay is unfortunate: The first two words make me automatically puke a little in my mouth, and I cannot be alone. Unfortunate, for once you get going, the going gets good. How about Vaxx Pushers instead? Banal, maybe, but not discouraging to the potential reader.
If the holohoax actually happened, and the Allies really did save the Jews from evil gas chambers and masturbation machines, Jews should be building monuments to their White rescuers and singing their praises. Instead they write article after article and policy after policy about how evil Whites are. They are ungrateful to their liberators. Men charged into machine gun fire to save them, and now they’re telling the generations that came after that they all deserve to die for the crime if being White.
Thus begs the following questions:
If the holohoax was real, and jews hate their liberators, doesn’t that prove Hitler was right about them?
Or alternatively, if jews feel free to attack their liberators and have no guilt in doing so, doesn’t that prove the holohoax never happened?