SKEPTICAL OPTIMISM

...watching the world go by as an analytical observer

Feb 07, 2023

THE SKEPTICAL OPTIMIST

I believe there are many of us that feel disassociated from the HERD, especially during the ‘rona pandemic PsyOp of 2020-even until today, three years later. Some of us struggle with friends and family members who have chosen to live in a state of denial and outright ignore-ance with regard to the facts and data that has been available to all who take the time and make an effort to engage in a little research. We avid observers are in a process of disclosure re a diabolical event that is clearly power-profit driven with links to the WEF/WHO totalitarian Reset. Why many have chosen to avoid this obvious conclusion re a globalist playbook has repercussions that must be acknowledged in order to move forward as a community and nation.

The observation and explanation for friends and family who live in denial goes something like this:

The reasons why so many people have followed the orders of untrustworthy sources and corrupt authority figures is a combination of the following:

Some folks are too tired to question the narrative—i.e., work-a-day-treadmill fatigue.
Some people only use FB or their SmartPhoneys for research—which limits any effort to engage in a deep dive(censorship is a fact of life if Google is one’s primary research tool).
Programming:

By association, those who have a roof over head and a 401K, who have followed the script laid down by the ruling class, assume that their perceived prosperity is a direct result of following the herd, rather than challenging the status quo. Rocking the herd’s boat has never been fun, nor does it win you brownie points with those peers who also wish to avoid looking at the truth.

Despite the fact that some of us look at those who swallowed the CV-19 narrative— hook, line, and sinker as easy targets and gullible rubes, we still cannot fathom why it’s taking so long for these targets to accept the fact that they were deceived. It’s not as if the data, science, and evidence isn’t available. Even Tucker is reporting on much of the science-based evidence and factual data on mainstream TV, while questioning the censorship imposed by Oligarchy’s interests.

This brings some of us to another conclusion: Those who erroneously trusted authority figures with their lives and health refuse to admit that they made a mistake(by getting the jab and booster cocktail)—as if to suggest that their blessed egos are too fragile to admit they were hoodwinked.

Which opens yet another door and macro perception:

What is this Reality that we accept as the real deal vs an alternative reality that appears as some matrix-like illusion construct. Are the illusory realms (self-deception) and artificial constructs(such as A.I. digital realities) one and the same? In other words: throughout the ages, the sage spiritual shaman-teacher-gurus have instructed us that we are held as prisoners by our very own beliefs. And that most of what we think of as ‘real’ are merely ‘fictional narratives’ designed to hold us as prisoners… or, as slaves. And perhaps, A.I. is part of a matrix enforcer that is millions of years old. As the saying goes, ‘the best slave is one who believes that they are free.’ Translation: as a society we agree to the terms of our enslavement—especially when we choose to bend to the willful mandates imposed by complicit authorities(who are also bound by the same ignorance that defines the premise for an overriding Fear.)

In any event, we allow those in power positions to hold sway over us even when the decision is detrimental and negative to our lives and to the future of humanity. This type of slavery/servitude is a form of masochism and ‘victim attachment’—plain and simple. The Buddha’s lessons on detachment seem apropos at this point in the dialog. Why remain attached to an errant perception filter when it’s not serving our own well being, much less contributing to the possibility of a healthier, and saner world?

And this opens the next door:

Where does Artificial Intelligence begin and end?

And it is in this conversation that my ‘inner skeptic’ and ‘eternal curious child of the universe’ are alive and engaged in the deeper dialog and investigation. Why live a Lie when we can celebrate the Truth?

The Skeptical Optimist is Born

What is an informed optimist?

In the use of our contemporary slang, I’ll choose to look at the word, “optics.”

The prefix “opt” first needs consideration:

opt

verb

1 I always opt for the better quality: choose, select, pick (out), decide on, go for, settle on, take.

2 she's opted to stay in Richmond: choose, elect, decide, make/reach the decision, make up one's mind.

Optics may be defined as: “filters” that persuade us to accept a particular narrative, or accept a particular set of facts as a framework for that which is “real” or that which we “believe” is real.

The consensus in 2020 varied from observer to observer, although it is a fact that the CDC, and the WHO, and governments around the globe supported the pandemic narrative as an epidemic of great magnitude that would result in the deaths of many millions of people. The media used its scripts and SFX and the screens to embed a narrative program—a program that has many stakeholders and benefactors who will support whatever narrative is in their best interests. To some, the idea of acknowledging the existence of “conspiracy” equates to a decision in becoming a “cynic.” We’ve all heard comments in this regard when we state a fact regarding say, Bill Gates, and his well-known statement regarding a 20% return on investment on the topic of vaccine profits. What Billy did not tell the people is that governments would use the people’s very own tax dollars to provide windfall profits for the Pharma corpse, to include investors like Gates. Hence, a plausible assertion arises that the mRNA rollout was indeed a conspiracy on many fronts, and not only a profit mechanism.

Another Internet headline example:

“WHO declares coronavirus a pandemic”

How can any thinking caring adult not feel a sense of outrage when considering how a tremendous lie provided Oligarchs the means to swindle the masses and control what are supposed to be democratically elected representatives? How can a person blindly embrace optimism when such evil presents itself? …especially when the institutions that we believed were our allies (like the FDA, CDC, and U.N. for example), are revealed as corrupt and disruptive agents in support of global tyranny?

This is how the qualifier “skeptical” in tandem with “optimist” is an authentic use of the two terms. Whereas an optimist who veers towards the “always think positive” thought-form, or optical choice—is shutting themselves down and avoiding growing into a mature adult who may cultivate wisdom and the survival skill-set needed in order to avoid being taken to the cleaners. To remain a gullible rube is neither noble or practical or intelligent.

This brings us back to the question: What do we do when we are aware that a friend, family member, or peer seems unable or incapable of considering the evidence of a crime against humanity that is without historical precedent? One of my close friends once told me, at the beginning of the scam-demic, that he would say to people who were invested in the pandemic narrative (lockdowns, and masks, and a fake vaxx etc), “Enjoy your reality!” …That about sums it up, in a very direct manner.

Who’s reality are we dealing with here? Or is it the WHO’s reality we are dealing with? The WHO, UN, WEF, and Davos trolls are all complicit allies in maintaining the hellscape they sustain as the new abnormal. I and other Substack writers have identified the guilty parties to the point of over-saturation. This brings us back to the term— “Skeptical.”

Some of us feel very skeptical when we try to imagine jurisprudence applied to the criminal Oligarch class—as in, Nuremberg Trials 2.0; and this skepticism doesn’t necessarily imply that real justice is not a possibility. It just looks like we are facing a climb up Mt Everest and a blizzard is underway. And yet, blizzard or not— many intrepid adventurers lived to tell the tale of reaching Everest’s summit. This analogy might be considered one of those metaphors defined by a ‘Pollyanna filter.’ I don’t see it as a Pollyanna filter however, I just see the mountain climb ahead as a process that will require temerity and informed optimism that will ensure the climb results in success.

The goal in seeing justice delivered to those who are guilty of crimes against humanity is akin to reaching the summit. How we deal with these sorts of crimes in the future is a great test of our humanity, and the future of homo sapiens.

Prevention is 99% of the cure.

eScapeGoats & Digital Realities

Discussion about this post