The 500 lb Ukrainian Gorilla
...and the Azov elephants in our living room
Recently I was listening to Lara Logan on the Stew Peters show, and Logan mentioned how the buildings in L.A. are surrounded by Ukrainian flags in some sort of virtue-signaling theatrical show—as if to suggest that solidarity with Zelenskyy (a former comedian/actor) is just another example of Hollywood’s usual fake democratic stance. The Hollywood brand was founded on camera and lighting deception, and mirror tricks—hence no one should expect Hollywood’s moguls to honor or uphold the tenets of truth or justice. Box office receipts have always mattered most to its stakeholders. Fantasy and fakery are the tools of the trade for the magicians who create cinematic eye candy. I’m not saying that I don’t appreciate magic when it’s done well. It’s just that we all need to remember how ‘tail wags dog’ works, especially now in the wake of various mega-global psyops. Ukraine is the current 500 Lb gorilla in our realm.
A Useful Definition:
Hollywood, Then and Now
We are a long way from the days of the golden-age Hollywood when Jimmy Stewart actually took time off to fly bombers for the US Army Air Corps during WW II.
The new Hollywood is shameless when it comes to fake patriotism that is actually just another theatrical gaslighting stunt. Some of us might’ve watched Sean Penn give Zelenskyy his Oscar, inviting Mr. Z to come to Hollywood anytime he wishes— where he will then receive red-carpet treatment from the Hollywood elite. I wondered if Sean was possibly sending a different message: As if to say to Mr. Z— ‘you’re performance is Oscar worthy’; and— I’m trying to make light of the fact that you’re just another actor in league with the Khazarian mafia whose cabal-agents also run the big movie studios. Not that I have any great expectation that a player of Penn’s stature would bite the hand that feeds him. I suspect many A-list actors have signed contracts that prohibit them from criticizing the Hollywood brand’s Leftist agenda. On the other hand, many celebrities are “turned”—consider Bono as one example.
This brings us to the mythology regarding the origins of the Hollywood legacy.
The story goes something like this:
Eastern European Jewish men came to America to create and run a mega-billion dollar entertainment franchise. In my historical purview it is conceivable that many of Hollywood’s original moguls could’ve been related to the Khazarian bloodline. As revealed via the more discerning story of the Khazarian bloodline —the Khazars are not considered one of the original twelve Jewish tribes. [one credible source:“The Thirteenth Tribe”, by Arthur Koestler] Regardless of this plausible proposition, the original studio moguls may also be considered as “the chosen people”—especially in consideration of the dark money rituals that have revealed an exploitative view of the “goyim”,i.e., the Caucasian “slave-class.” In many ways, the Hollywood actor-contract system certainly suggests a neo-Roman slave class model.
What is a ‘goyim’ anyhow?
goyim: In modern Hebrew and Yiddish goy (/ɡɔɪ/, Hebrew: גוי, regular plural goyim /ˈɡɔɪ.ɪm/, גוים or גויים) is a term for a gentile, a non-Jew.
In the dictionary, the distinction that “goyim” is a pejorative label is also of interest for a variety of reasons that are obvious—especially in terms of maintaining a particular cultish social order.
As a renegade Zionist informer, Benjamin Freedman told his audience in 1960, that there is an inner Zionist cult and agenda that operates outside of the average Jewish person’s community. This historical fact has cultivated a view that there is a particular socio-religious sect some critical observers might label as the “Synagogue of Satan.” To anyone who is aware of the history of “anti-semitic” allegations, exploring the truth and details regarding the layers of political deception and historical intrigue oftentimes invites a predictable reaction among the actual stakeholders—such as the mainstream Media’s faux protestations. As we’ve witnessed time and time again, the media maintains a holier-than-thou posture(to appease its advertisers), and yet is driven by ratings and profit margins. Despite all of its self-righteous posturing—the mainstream Media remains loyal to companies such as Pfizer, and charlatans like Bill Gates and Tony Fauci. Overall, the mainstream media’s reaction to injustice and deceit is just more virtue-signaling wokeness in service to its advertisers.
“Anti-Semitism” as Diversionary Tactic:
This diversionary psychological tactic is used so often that a presumption has emerged as if it is in itself an unshakeable truth, i.e., any ‘anti-semitic criticism’ is most often attributed to an embedded institutional form of white supremacy. The inconvenient truth is that a gas-lighting tactic is just a handy ‘sleight of hand’ move when families— such as the Rothschilds— wish to divert any critic’s attention from their criminal activities as banksters. And yet, if a goyim criticizes a criminal banker who possesses a name that implies Jewish heredity, the accusation circles back and confronts the person who made the comment(especially in the press)— as if a factual observation of greedy criminality is just another example of anti-semitism. In reality, it’s the inverse. The guilty party (banksters) are the actual racists and use the goyim as scapegoats. Labeling your accuser with a racist slur is an effective means to divert the attention of the public and spark outrage in order to cultivate politically advantageous positions in the press. Furthermore, the term, “semite”, may also be attributed to an “arab.” Therefore, anti-semitic may also imply “anti-arab.” Conclusion: specificity is in short supply when propaganda wars are raging.
What is most curious in terms of the Rothschild legacy: “Mayer Rothschild’s original name was Mayer Amschel Bauer but changed to the previous family name of “Rothschild.” The German translation of “Rothschild” is also most intriguing: “Red Shield.” Also of note is the relatively recent distinction re “de Rothschild” as an alteration of the original family surname— “Rothschild.”
A Brief History Of The Rothschild Banking Family
“Though he never lived outside of Frankfurt’s Jewish slum, coin merchant Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812), groomed his five sons to disperse to European capitals and amass the largest fortune in the world. Son Amschel (born in 1773) stayed in Germany. Solomon (born in 1774) went to Vienna. Nathan (born in 1777) became an English citizen. Carl (born in 1788) was dispatched to Naples. And James (1792) would become one of the most powerful men in France.
“After their father’s death during the Napoleonic wars, Nathan emerged as the most powerful brother. Indeed, he was the Bill Gates of his era — only richer! At his death in 1835, Nathan was worth .62 percent of the United Kingdom’s gross domestic product, or 3.5 million pounds. (Bill Gates’ wealth is .49 percent of the U.S. GDP.) Nathan had accumulated 160,000 times the per capita national income. Had he followed the English custom of leaving his fortune to the eldest of his four sons, that son (Lionel) would have been the richest man in England, but the wealth was distributed among all four sons. When their uncle James (of the French branch of the family) died in 1868, he was the richest man in Europe.”—“The House of Rothschild”
by Niall Ferguson—Review by Cheryl Bolen
HISTORY OF THE KHAZARS
“Origins. The Khazars were a Turkic1 people who originated in Central Asia. The early Turkic tribes were quite diverse, although it is believed that reddish hair was predominant among them prior to the Mongol conquests. In the beginning, the Khazars believed in Tengri shamanism, spoke a Turkic language, and were nomadic. Later, the Khazars adopted Judaism, Islam, and Christianity, learned Hebrew and Slavic, and became settled in cities and towns throughout the north Caucasus and Ukraine. The Khazars had a great history of ethnic independence extending approximately 800 years from the 5th to the 13th century.
In reference to the Khazarian conversion to all three religious factions, and especially the Judaic religion, the following is an important detail: * “Tatarinova's team concluded that the Khazars' DNA doesn't match the Ashkenazic Jews' DNA.” [see footnote at article’s end.]
The current Ukraine situation is rife with smoke and mirrors, and the latest sensational US media blitz has all the classic features of any wartime propaganda exercise. Ukraine has a history as a human trafficking hub as well as a money-laundering mecca for elite government players.
Modern-Day Azov Insignia & WW II Nazi SS Insignia:
Ed. note: A late edition to article. Evidence to support “complicity theory.”—
A review of the origins of Khazarian/Ukrainian geography and borderlines—
Consolidation of the Khazar State
“According to Theophanes (ibid., 358), the ruler of the Bulgars in the region of the Kuban River (West Caucasus) died c. 650 c.e., leaving five sons of whom only the eldest remained in his inheritance, while the others moved further west, as far as the Danube. On this, the Khazars, described as a "great nation … from the interior of Berzilia in the First Sarmatia," emerged and took possession of the territory as far as the Black Sea. The change of position was completed by 679, when one of the brothers crossed the Danube and conquered present-day Bulgaria. Earlier than this, in 576 c.e., a West Turkish force had been present at the siege of Bosporus (Kerch) in the Crimea (Menander Protector, ed. Bonn, 404), but hitherto there is no mention of the Khazars as such so far to the west.”—https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/asia-and-africa/central-asian-history/khazars#3404100647
1960—Benjamin Freedman’s Willard Hotel Speech
—Worthy of review and a history lesson that all Americans should understand…especially now as the Ukraine deception is in full bloom. It was very difficult to reduce the length of Freedman’s speech excerpts due to the sheer magnitude of detailed revelations re both world wars.
Disclaimer: The following speech is a historical footnote, and provides details that our press(even to this day) suppresses or avoids altogether. My intention in publishing Freedman’s speech is to encourage discourse and dialog rather than cultivate ignorance or fear. I intend no disrespect to anyone’s religious faith.—editor
Excerpt from the introduction:
“The speaker is Mr. Benjamin Freedman, noted authority on Zionism and all of its schemes. Mr. Freedman is a former Jew, and I mean a FORMER Jew. He has fought the Communist world conspiracy tooth and nail, and stands today as a leading American patriot.”
Bejamin Freedman's 1960 speech-excerpts:
“…Four out of five human beings on the face of the earth will be our enemies at war with us[The U.S.]. And not alone are they four out of five human beings now on the face of this earth, but they are the non-Christian population of the world and they are the non-Caucasians... the non-white nations of the world, and that's what we face…
And what is the reason? The reason is that here in the United States, the Zionists and their co- religionists have complete control of our government. For many reasons too many and too complex to go into here, at this time, I'll be glad to answer questions, however, to support that statement -- the Zionists and their co-religionists rule this United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country.
Now, you say, 'well, that's a very broad statement to make' …but let me show what happened while WE were all asleep. I'm including myself with you. We were all asleep. What happened?”
[I’ve edited together a more concise digest of the longer speech in order to retain the message’s integrity while focusing on its most important features—RTT]
“World War I broke out in the summer of 1914…Within two years Germany had won that war: not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with one week's food supply facing her — and after that, starvation.”
“…The French army had mutinied. They lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.”
“…Now Germany — not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: “Let's call the war off, and let everything be as it was before the war started.”
“While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet… and they said: “Look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally.”
“The United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were powerful. They [Zionists] told England: “We will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war.”
“…They made this deal: ‘We will get the United States into this war as your ally.’ The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria- Hungary, and Turkey.”
In October of 1916— “…I don't know how many here remember it—the United States, which was almost totally pro-German — totally pro-German— because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they were pro-German because their people, in the majority of cases came from Germany, and they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar.”
“…The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. So the German bankers — the German-Jews — Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and said: “As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!” But they poured money into Germany, they fought with Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist regime.”
“…Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, they went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed…all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies' hands. And they were no good. Well, shortly after that, Mr. Wilson declared war on Germany.”
“Now the war —World War One, in which the United States participated had absolutely no reason to be our war. We went in there —-we were railroaded into it— if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now, that is something that the people in the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War One.”
“After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: “Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war.” Because they didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration.”
“The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. And I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.”
“The United States went into the war. The United States crushed Germany. We went in there, and it's history. You know what happened. Now, when the war was ended, and the Germans went to Paris, to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened?”
“The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations that claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, the Jews said, “How about Palestine for us?” And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, “Oh, that was the game! That's why the United States came into the war.” And the Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered this terrific reparation that was slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and they were determined to get it at any cost…When the Germans realized this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany…”
The German people felt betrayed, as Freedman elaborates— "We've been so nice to them"; and from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than they wanted Palestine as a so- called “Jewish commonwealth.”
Freedman continues, “…the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat, for no reason at all, because World War One was started against Germany for no reason for which they [Germans] were responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade…
“…Their navy was rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody and make better products. And what happened? What happened as a result of that?”
“There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia that: "We must slap down Germany", because there isn't one historian in the world that can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically…”
“When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew who Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called camps of political prisoners. And he wrote back that he found them in very fine condition.”
“…the Jews sort of tried to keep the lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.”
“So they did take appropriate action against them [against the Jews]. They . . . shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could? They shunned them. The same as we would the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat.”
“…After a while, the Jews of the world didn't know what to do, so they called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every country in the world attended in July 1933. And they said to Germany: “You fire Hitler! And you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a Communist, no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way! And we, the Jews of the world, are calling upon you, and serving this ultimatum upon you.”
“…Now, at that time, when the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, it was quiet, the Jews were working, still trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could, without hurting a hair on anyone's head. The same as one group, the Prohibitionists, fought the people who were interested in liquor, and they didn't fight one another with pistols, they did it every way they could.”
“Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And, at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans and there were only 460,000 Jews . . . less than one half of one percent of Germany were Jews. And yet, they controlled all of the press, they controlled most of the economy, because they had come in and with cheap money—you know the way the Mark was devalued -- they bought up practically everything.”
in 1933 when Germany refused to surrender, mind you, to the World Conference of Jews in Amsterdam, they broke up and Mr. Untermeyer came back to the United States — who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference— and he went from the steamer to ABC and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he said:
"The Jews of the world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them, that will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business."
“… two-thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. Their labor. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There just was not enough food for more than one third of the population.”
“Now in this declaration, which I have here, it was printed on page —-a whole page in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that: “this economic boycott is our means of self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the NRA" . [National Recovery Administration] —which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless they followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, which of course was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court at that time.
Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words ‘made in Germany’ on it.” “ …an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted. If anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed with signs: "Hitler", "murderer", and so forth, and like..”
“R. H. Macy, which is controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews. . . a woman found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany". Well, they were cotton stockings. They may have been there 20 years, because since I've been observing women's legs in the last twenty years, I haven't seen a pair with cotton stockings on them. So Macy! I saw Macy boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with signs saying "MURDERS" and "HITLERITES", and so forth. Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.”
“…naturally, the Germans said, "Why, who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work, and our industries come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews.”
“…That continued for some time, and it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot one of the officials [a German official] that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.”
Freedman discusses the repercussions and the emergence of the term—anti-semitism:
“…I don't like to use the word 'anti-Semitism' because it's meaningless, but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it— the only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible: number one, for World War One; number two, for this world-wide boycott, and number three — did I say for World War One, they were responsible? For the boycott—and also for World War II, because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive.”
This next stanza is particularly profound and prescient:
“…by that time the United States had recognized the Soviet Union, which they did in November, 1933 —the Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany realized: "Well, our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong.”
“And our government [the U.S.] is spending 83 or 84 billion dollars [in 1960 dollars-ed.] of your money for defense, they say. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other governments of the world.”
“Now, for this country to now be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination.”
“…the curtain goes up on Act III. Act I was World War I. Act II was World War II. Act III is going to be World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. Now, that is just as true as I am standing here, because not alone have I read it, but many here have read it, and it's known all over the world.”
Freedman then elaborates on the political machinations of the “incompetent” President Wilson(who bent to the will of the Euro-Banksters when the Federal Reserve Act was created in 1913) and finance committee chairman-Henry Morgenthau, Sr. and Rollo Wells, the Treasurer, before introducing us to the Khazarian connection:
“Now, what are the facts about the Jews?”
“The Jews -- I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews. I don't call them Jews. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are. If Jesus was a Jew, there isn't a Jew in the world today, and if those people are Jews, certainly our Lord and Savior was not one of them, and I can prove that.”
“Now what happened? The eastern European Jews, who form 92 percent of the world's population of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars.”
“They were a warlike tribe that lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics drove them out of Asia into Eastern Europe — and to reduce this so you don't get too confused about the history of Eastern Europe — they set up this big Khazar kingdom: 800,000 square miles. Only, there was no Russia, there were no other countries, and the Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe— so big and so powerful that when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. That's how big and powerful they were.”
“…They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy. I don't want to go into the details of that now. It was their religion the way it was the religion of many other Pagans or Barbarians elsewhere in the world.”
“…The [Khazar] king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith —either Christianity, Islam— the Moslem faith— or what is known today as Judaism —really Talmudism. So, like spinning a top and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion.”
“…these Pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns. . . they were a Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. They likewise, because their king took the faith—Talmudic faith—they had no choice. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So everybody— they lived on the land just like the trees and the bushes; a human being belonged to the land under their feudal system -- so they [Khazars] all became what we call today, Jews!
Now imagine how silly it was for the Christians. . . for the great Christian countries of the world to say, "We're going to use our power, our prestige to repatriate God's chosen people to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land."
“Now, could there be a bigger lie than that? Could there be a bigger lie than that?”
“…And because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, they have the ministers in the pulpit, they have the politicians on the soap boxes talking the same language . . . so naturally you'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call ‘black’ black anymore -- you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you.
Now, that is one of the great lies. . . that is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the world.”
Freedman brings the narrative perspective back to the political realities, in 1960 terms:
“I can't understand yet how the Christians in Europe could have been that dumb because every theologian, every history teacher, knew the things that I'm telling you. But, they naturally bribed them, shut them up with money, stuffed their mouths with money, and now. . . I don't care whether you know all this or not. It doesn't make any difference to me whether you know all these facts or not, but it does make a difference to me. I've got, in my family, boys that will have to be in the next war, and I don't want them to go and fight and die... like they died in Korea. Like they died in Japan. Like they've died all over the world. For what?
To help crooks hold on to what they stole from innocent people who had been in peaceful possession of that land, those farms, those homes for hundreds and maybe thousands of years? Is that why the United States must go to war? Because the Democratic Party wants New York State — the electoral vote? Illinois, the electoral vote? And Pennsylvania, the electoral vote?... which are controlled by the Zionists and their co-religionists?. . . the balance of power?
In New York City there are 400,000 members of the liberal party, all Zionists and their co-religionists. And New York State went for Kennedy by 400,000 votes. Now, I don't blame Mr. Kennedy. I'm fond of Mr. Kennedy. I think he's a great man. I think he can really pull us out of this trouble if we get the facts to him. And I believe he knows a great deal more than his appointments indicate he knows. He's playing with the enemy. Like when you go fishing, you've got to play with the fish. Let 'em out and pull 'em in. Let 'em out and pull 'em in. But knowing Mr. Kennedy's father, and how well informed he is on this whole subject, and how close Kennedy is to his father, I don't think Mr. Kennedy is totally in the dark.
The oath that means nothing… back to the German deception in 1916:
“…Do you know that on the day of atonement that you think is so sacred to them, that on that day... and I was one of them! This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts.
When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, the very first prayer that you recite, you stand — and it's the only prayer for which you stand —and you repeat three times a short prayer. The Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months —any oath, vow or pledge that you may take during the next twelve months shall be null and void.
The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force and effect, and so forth and so on.
And further than that, the Talmud teaches: "Don't forget -- whenever you take an oath, vow, and pledge -- remember the Kol Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and that exempts you from fulfilling that."
“How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.”
Towards the end of his speech, Freedman discusses his newspaper, “Common Sense”
“…and then discusses the importance of people forgoing unnecessary purchases to 'buy more stuff', play golf, etc., and use the money to keep "Common Sense" going. He explains that the paper is going in debt; could be closed down and he (Freedman) no longer has the funds, having spent some $2,400,000 in his attempt to bring the information to the American public and elected officials. He then asks for questions from the audience.”
…all for now…perhaps there’ll be a Part Two.
Link to pdf of Freedman’s entire speech:
https://highlanderjuan.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Benjamin-H-Freedman-Speech-at-the-Willard-Hotel-1961.pdf
History:
https://www.cherylbolen.com/rothschild.htm
*Footnotes on DNA of Ashkenazis vs Khazarians:
Tatiana V. Tatarinova and her co-authors (including Khazaria.com's contributing writer Vladimir Klyuchnikov) have a forthcoming paper titled "Diverse genetic origins of medieval steppe nomad conquerors". They released the preprint version on December 16, 2019 to BioRxiv. The final version will be published at Nature.com. They examined the autosomal DNA and the uniparental markers of 9 ethnic upper-class Khazars (8 men, 1 woman) from 5 medieval Khazarian archaeological sites in Rostov Oblast's southern Russian steppelands. Their bones were provided for the research by the archaeologist Klyuchnikov and his colleague Elena Batieva. They had been buried near the Don river during the 8th-10th centuries, Supplementary Table S3 and the "Y-chromosome analysis" section reveal the following data:
•Sample 67 belonged to the mtDNA haplogroup D4e5 which is common in today's East Asia and also found in North Asia and Southeast Asia and among Amerindians. D4e5 is never found among Ashkenazim.
•Sample 166 belonged to the mtDNA haplogroup C4 which is a Eurasian/Far Eastern haplogroup. C4 is never found among Ashkenazim.
•Sample 531 belonged to the mtDNA haplogroup X2e which is common in modern Turkey and the United Kingdom.
•Sample 619 belonged to the Y-DNA haplogroup Q and the mtDNA haplogroup H1a3 which the authors suggest might indicate a connection to Southwest Asia.
•Sample 656 belonged to the Y-DNA haplogroup C3 and the mtDNA haplogroup C4a1 which is a Eurasian/Far Eastern haplogroup. C3 and C4a1 are never found among Ashkenazim.
•Sample 1251 belonged to the Y-DNA haplogroup R1a and the mtDNA haplogroup H5b which is currently common in southwestern Eurasia and the Caucasus. H5b is never found among Ashkenazim.
•Sample 1564 belonged to the mtDNA haplogroup H13c1 which is found among modern Europeans. The DNA study's authors don't mention the fact that H13c1 is also found among Armenians from Turkey. H13c1 is never found among Ashkenazim.
•Sample 1566 belonged to the mtDNA haplogroup D4b1a1a which is common in Northeast Asia. D4b1a1a is never found among Ashkenazim.
•Sample 1986 belonged to the Y-DNA haplogroup R1a and the mtDNA haplogroup C4a1c which is a Eurasian/Far Eastern haplogroup. C4a1c is never found among Ashkenazim.
Looking at their complete genomes, utilizing full genome NGS sequencing and interpreting this with reAdmix and GPS tools, they write that samples 67, 166, 1566, and 1686 have strong Asian (in the sense of Mongoloid) autosomal elements, with 166 and 1566 described as "purely Siberian", while samples 619 and 656 are highly mixed between Asian and European elements, and samples 531, 1251, and 1564 are primarily European but also carry minority Asian admixture. Their European elements were mostly from Eastern Europe. They also write that some of their skulls racially had Mongoloid morphologies while others had Caucasoid morphologies.
Link: http://www.khazaria.com/genetics/medieval/khazars.html
Possible roots for the name “Holly-wood” —https://thegreatwork208716197.wordpress.com/2020/03/09/%E2%9E%9D-the-term-hollywood-derives-from-the-holly-tree/
Koestler—The 13th Tribe: http://fantompowa.info/13th%20Tribe.pdf
Would part 2 be anywhere in the works?
You lost me in the genetics. In plain English, what Is their True genetic background? Are they Also not truly Jewish?