Trump Derangement Syndrome-orientation
...Indoctrinated brains-scrambled and fried
Another subheading might be:
“PsyOps-Psychosis and the Plandemic-Blow back”
Our brains after the PsyOp:
A very brief book review (brief, because I haven’t read most of it)…
“THE TRUMP INDICTMENTS”
In consideration of the Stormy weather saga—what might stand out for some adults (with a memory) is the similarity of Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky’s brief flirtation with the press. In retrospect, the Stormy drama simply looks like another political power-play where a politician-player was targeted in order to remove them from a particular position. Most of the DC cabal’s playbook-moves appear as blackmail feted by sexual deviance. In many cases the assertions of perversity appear as justified (as in the case of Pedo Joe and his daughter’s diary entries.)
In my purview of ‘politics as usual’, Donald Trump slept with a woman who chose to sleep with him. No rape, and no force or assault was reported. Daniels even joked with Bill Maher about this fact when Maher asked her point blank, “Why did you f__k Donald Trump?” She replied, “I have no idea.” The “F” word is now bleeped on the videos I’ve found. [if any reader knows where I can get the un-bleeped video with Maher please leave a link in comments.]
Lest I wander too far afield of the topic as suggested by this article’s title—I’m going to examine a book entitled, “The Trump Indictments.” But first, I feel it’s necessary to review the political timeline and how the wheels of media commerce roll.
Stormy Weather
The term “Indictment” has a very heavy feel to it—as if to suggest that even before evidence is produced, the indictment must be deserved. Or as some folks might say, “Trump’s gotta be guilty of somethin’—or why would there be so much hoopla?!”
Why would the government, District Attorney’s, and so forth, spend so much time and effort, and taxpayer’s money in order to produce such a dramatic dog & pony show?
It’s called Politics. I call it ‘Theater.’
Here’s the man they planned to put on trial since 2016. The man who dared to take on the established political order in the DC principality; the man who had enjoyed a life where he could occasionally play golf without being served with a subpoena.
President Trump also brought us quotes like the following:
“Never forget-our enemies want to take away MY freedom because I will never let them take away YOUR freedom. They want to silence ME because I will never let them silence YOU. In the end, they’re not after me, they’re after you-and I’m just standing in their way!”—President Donald Trump
An irksome detail as a provocative point of reference:
TDS-ORIENTATION, Part One
The book, the library, and the serendipitous moment of discovery—
I was at the library returning a couple of DVD’s and decided to check out the area that is designated for study groups and teenage literary fare. At first glance I saw that the furniture was smaller and lower to the ground. I presumed that smaller tables and chairs would make the kids and teens feel more comfortable, making them feel bigger than they actually are. So there’s the social engineering angle to consider—how a child feels affects how they perform at school, and eventually how they might perform at a job. One day, perhaps they will work for Amazon and their plantation boss, Mr. Bezos.
In other words—make the teens feel bigger by giving them smaller desks. Never mind that at the end of the college career, small paychecks are still not enough to finance buying a decent home. Perhaps this much psychological analysis is unnecessary; however, Dr Nehl’s recent book, “The Indoctrinated Brain” brings us into a much deeper look at neurolinguistics and the bio-programming of our human minds.
Social engineering and bio-engineering are just another chapter in the corporate/statecraft realm; and as I’ve written in the recent past—it’s all about control, and who gets the rewards for keeping the ‘established order of things’ on track.
LIBRARY STAGECRAFT…The Book and its placement
Here’s the main detail that struck me as “staged”—
As I reached the second floor, and entered the ‘smaller table’ area, I spied a book on the table closest to the stair landing. The book was suspiciously alone and positioned at an angle— akin to the sort of display technique of a window dresser working for a department store. You know, where the mannequin posture and select accoutrements and every detail down to the pearl necklace and fingernail polish are perfectly positioned in a mannered window display.
Exhibit (a)…the book
The Optics
Firstly, notice the strategic gold medal emblem with approval inferred: “NY Times Bestseller.” Straight off— the mind imagines the numbers of sales and impressions made. The cred among lawyer-peers; the book tours; the speaker fees; the life of a celebrity author; the prestige; and also a framing context implied via the NY Time’s seal of approval: “This book is a serious and important work that every freedom-loving American needs to read—especially before the upcoming election!”
As with all books that are published strategically prior to any election, it’s the optimal marketing tactic that ensures a healthy ROI on the publisher’s investment,i.e., a no-brainer. Consider the expected sales figures of the Obama bio and political advertisement— “The Audacity of Hope” (publ. 2006)— just when he was about to be installed as a Bush crony in 2008. Obama was/is a ‘brand,’ and to illustrate this fact Publisher’s weekly publicized this factoid in 2017:
“When word broke early last week that former president and first lady Barack and Michelle Obama had landed a joint deal at Penguin Random House worth a reported $65 million, many in the industry were stunned. The advance is, if not the largest on record for two standalone works, certainly the largest in recent memory.”
Trump is also a brand, and as many observers are aware, when he was no longer considered POTUS— and the loud mouthed New Yorker that the press loved to hate as a daily menu item—CNN’s ratings plummeted. Trump had been the CNN meal ticket for five years. Then we witnessed how the Media continued with it’s badgering indictments and accusations of mystery crimes even after the Biden team had taken up residency in the District.
How were the Network owners to ensure that higher viewer ratings and the corporate advert dollars would keep the failing News-entertainment programs in business? Broadcasting Trump’s recent trials are just one more desperate move to stay in biz, even if there’s nothing of merit to report.
And now—back to our program: “The Trump Indictments”, touted as a NY Times “bestseller,” and also another dire attempt to keep the Trump ‘outrage’ brand alive and milk it for all it is worth.
Orientation and the Derangement Syndrome, part two
I picked up “The Trump Indictments” and took it downstairs as I considered whether to mis-shelve the book in order to protect younger politically un-savvy eyes from reading this tainted propaganda. Instead, I decided that I should try to read it, or at lease scan a few paragraphs and make a half-hearted attempt to review the contents as a media observer.
I quickly shuffled through its pages searching for some type of glossary, or index, in order to see if the FBI or CIA were mentioned. There is no glossary and no index, however, just a rather tedious display of Lawyer legalese. In a word, a bit on the dry side and not an exceptional page turner; i.e., somewhat boring unless one is a law student. Not mentioning the FBI’s involvement in the J6 fiasco is also a notable omission, especially as Project Veritas and other recent covert interviews have gone viral on the internet.
In order to own up to my own shortcomings as a book reviewer, I will offer a generous caveat in my own feeble attempt to exonerate the lawyer-authors who endured the path of law school, and especially when considering the money it costs in order to practice law. I am not a lawyer, book publisher, nor especially prescient on matters that are political. However, I do have a brain and some sort of internal BS meter that is highly attuned to the nature of finance and con artistry.
Aside from my quick perusal of the lawyer’s Trump indictment tome, I will try to discern with the least amount of self-righteous bias possible, a condensed digest of the impressions made by this book; and to review with a critical ear and eye, the derangement factors wrought by the media’s incessant attacks on a man known as Donald Trump.
The Book’s Introduction
The introduction begins with a quote chosen for it’s peculiar choice of words (those New Yorkers are a witty bunch!) which might result in many ‘literal’ interpretations and variations—all of which serve the attorneys well when creating a context for criminality and the payoff. [note: a lawyers paycheck relies upon ‘billable hours’; and lawyers log just about every minute that they open their mouths to move their lips.]
The TRUMP quote that the lawyer-authors and/or book editor selected:
“I could stand in the middle of Fifth Ave. and shoot somebody, and I wouldn’t lose any voters, OK? It’s, like, incredible.”
Alert!: Spin doctoring in sight—right down to the insertion of commas in order to emphasize the Donald’s manner of NYC street talk.
Never mind that “W” (the younger Bush, or minor shrub) spoke like a high school adolescent and referred to his wealthy supporters as his “base.” We were taught to regard “W” as a wayward bad-boy who had reformed himself through bible study; and he had earned the direct connection with the man upstairs. “W” reminded us that “he” was the “Decider.”
Understanding any author’s contextual POV is also mucho-importante when it comes to books on politicians and any future POTUS.
The lawyer-authors chose a DT quote that is easily spun, especially when considering an introduction to the man under indictment. A quote that might translate as if he was saying that ‘he is above the law.’ A quote that would provide an average Democrat or RINO with the political mud-slinging opportunity to disparage the man as a “dictator”, or Hitler wannabe, or just another fat-headed egotist. All very manipulative-predictable-and standard operating procedure for the deep Media programming apparatus.
And yet, we are expected to forget how Obama made promises he never kept, or to ignore Joe Biden’s daughter’s accounts of showering with daddy; or Hunter’s laptop—now long forgotten as the fake news focuses on trumped up mythical indictments.
Aside from the omission of a legal glossary— which would’ve been helpful to all of us lay persons without a Harvard Law degree—they did include a “cast of characters” and the two notable figures (Trump co-defendants) who were mentioned are, Sydney Powell, and Rudy Giuliani.
The narrative spin-job done on both of these hardworking patriots is as expected: Powell and Giuliani allegedly interfered with the 2020 election, and this was/is their crime. In other words: they questioned the Media’s J6 production narrative and challenged the authority of the Deep State.
Much of Sydney Powell’s narrative spin rests upon allegations made regarding Dominion Voting Systems. The book’s authors state that Dominion’s connections with the CCP and any internet interference are baseless. The manner in which Powell is smeared appears as scandalous hubris, that is to say—it’s only scandalous, if one is not afflicted with TDS.
TDS- a Powerful Perception Bias and Filter
In the following extracts from the “cast of characters” section we see how the negative bias is implanted. The word choices, and the contextual skew illustrate the manner in which a political smear or negative inference is contrived. In essence, propaganda much! Words and phrases such as, “outlandish,” “concocted,”and “claimed without basis,” riddle the character assessments of an attorney whose reputation is, in actuality, beyond reproach.
Exhibit (b)
Sydney Powell
The heightened legal-drama-speak is indicated in the term: “co-conspirator.” Powell even has the designation, #3. She’s not even numero-uno in the “cast of characters.”
The choice of the sub-heading, “cast of characters”— also suggests we are watching a theatrical event, a play, and a scripted event.
Sydney Powell has written books on the decline of a fair and balanced criminal justice system (I prefer to label “system” as a “program”—i.e., a two-tiered justice program,.i.e., “Law for thee, but not for me.”)
I took a quick look at Powell’s book entitled, “Conviction Machine”, and was not surprised to find a a scholarly index—five pages in total. The book also includes a legal index under the heading, “notes” (twenty pages long!) with important legal precedents and the sorts of details omitted in a NY Times book review.
Chapter One of “Conviction Machine” features the heading: “CATCH-22, What Talking to the FBI Can Do to You.” [note to self: don’t talk to those J. Edgar Hoover boys and girls; and yet, what if they’re undercover?; or disguised as cross-dressers…how will I know when I’m being set-up?]
The opening volley in Powell’s book begins with this warning to us all:
“The government has a lethal weapon it can deploy at will against any unwary citizen. It is the deadly combination of the ability of federal agents to interview people without counsel; to formalize that interview in their own terms, language, and sequence; and then to seek prosecution of that person for the felony of making a false statement to a federal government official, under Title 18, United States Code, section 1001.”
This detail provides the discerning context:
“…Agents then seek to get to the truth by giving 1001 warnings to coax truthful information from the suspect. But the government has become much more aggressive about abusing the process to create stand-alone offenses and add-on charges to force guilty pleas.”
Apparently the hackneyed term, “entrapment,” is now standard operating procedure for deep state provocateurs. Aye, there’s the rub—'tis a fine line between a con-artist’s ploy and ‘operational procedure’ within Big Brother’s district.
Powell’s book, “Licensed to Lie” is also on my ‘must own’ book list. Here’s a brief synopsis:
“Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice is a book she prayed she would never have to write. It's written in the style of a legal thriller to be enjoyable and understandable to non-lawyers, but it is the true, behind-the-scenes insider perspective on major litigation during the last decade.”
re “Co-conspirator #3” cont.’
With regard to Ms Powell’s allegations that Dominion Voting Systems had probable compromising alliances with Venezuela, or had been involved in bribery scams, one might ask if there has been any proper investigation into Ms Powell’s assertions— without interference from agency goons working for the District?
Exhibit © [money talks… ‘Hacker News’]
UBS and Dominion:
> "SEC filings: The parent company of Dominion Voting Systems received $400 million from an Investment Bank in Switzerland that is 75% owned by the Chinese government. UBS Securities is a Swiss investment bank which owns 24.99% of UBS Securities Co LTD, a Chinese Investment Bank. The remaining 75% of UBS Securities CO LTD is owned by the Chinese government,” states the report."
Instead of making vague insinuations, why not just make the accusation that you're alluding to?”
Response to the question above: “I'll let the SEC filings do the talking, you can then decide if China owning voting machines are ‘vague insinuations.’ …BOOM!
As with all “narrative-shaping” programs (in plain sight), the manner in which the deep state’s ‘liars for hire’ gaslight and re-direct the attention of an unwitting public audience is difficult to dismiss during these end-times.
More on UBS:
Fact: UBS has been under investigation, and was convicted of fraud in the recent past:
“UBS AG and several of its U.S.-based affiliates (together, UBS) have agreed to pay $1.435 billion in penalties to settle a civil action filed in November 2018 alleging misconduct related to UBS’ underwriting and issuance of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) issued in 2006 and 2007.” source—US DOJ
There it is, in plain sight: 2006-2007—the ‘Bail Out’ years.
UBS Settlement—legal doc: https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/1310171/dl?inline
Fast forward to 2024, and Bloomberg featured this story:
Why might these details matter, especially as Sydney Powell was ensnared as a “co-conspirator” who had questioned the election outcome in 2020? The Matrix Media Machine (3 M’s) essentially delivered Ms Powell’s guilty verdict before a proper investigation of election shenanigans could be initiated. Just as Donald Trump’s constant appearances as a man presumed guilty until proven innocent has fueled the CNN/NPR/NYT narrative spin job since his tenure as POTUS from 2016 until now.
Spin&Smear and “The Trump Indictments”…in brief:
For all of the legal detritus offered up as relevant details and evidence of DT’s crimes of note (re: the alleged misinformation about Trump’s business holdings/taxes, etc, which for every last corporation in the US is S.O.P.—not to mention the hypocrisy of Amazon and Apple—terrible working conditions for the warehouse slaves), the programming and narrative spin-job must be rigorously assessed for what it really is:
A pre-election smear campaign constructed via media production hype, and masked as legitimate lawfare.
Traitors without loyalties to the US constitution have zero interest in whether or not foul play occurred during the 2020 election. To ignore this simple fact is to choose the likely annihilation of this nation. We’ve seen too much forensic evidence (ballot box stuffing videos featured in “2,000 Mules” for ex.), and the recent revelations regarding vote tampering have been verified as fact rather than speculation. CNN and the usual deep state media machine minions will continue to lie, cheat, and collect fat paychecks while Joe Nero fiddles and Rome burns. I am presuming that the likes of Maddow and Cooper have bunkers awaiting in Hawaii on Barry and Michael’s property.
The bottom-feeders can only stay underground for so long—eventually they’ll have to come up for air.
Video evidence of TDS on a plane—
For those who are not aligned with the matrix “program”—a serious consideration:
SEEING IS BELIEVING…
…a human being’s fatal flaw.
Revisiting the WTC/911 narrative—
X link:
WTC: Architectural integrity 101
Yup!