WAS IT A EUGENICS PROGRAM?

...& other notable fringe anomalies regarding the Scam-demic

Jan 25, 2023

Who was Margaret Sanger?

“In 1921 Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, and she served as its president until 1928. The league was one of the parent organizations of the Birth Control Federation of America, which in 1942 became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, with Sanger as honorary chairman.”

One of the most suppressive taboos has to do with trying to openly discuss Margaret Sanger’s “Planned Parenthood” program. And yet, Sanger was outspoken regarding her opinions on the benefits of eugenics,i.e., planning parenthood right down to the selection of optimal DNA types.

Making efforts to discuss ‘social engineering’ in its many guises invites the usual societal censorship that has become accepted almost as a matter of political correctness. On the surface, Sanger may have appeared to care about women’s rights, and especially the plight of impoverished mothers who were burdened with the chores of raising too many babies, instead of receiving an adequate education. Sanger’s demographic target was the black American population in particular. The issue regarding a woman’s right to an authentic education, and the choices that knowledge and awareness afford a person, is a global issue. It is a naive proposition to think of “equality” as some new and unique social issue. Nor is America the poster child for inequality. Obviously, the class/caste system and corporate Oligarchy ensure that inequality will be here for some time—unless we have a miracle of biblical proportions.

In the real world— where politicians use terms like “equality” or “equity” in order to maintain social order (or ‘dis-order’ as seems the case of corporate hegemony and a ruling Oligarchy) the inadequacies regarding deeper more truthful dialogs re: “the Human condition”, remain the SNAFU quotient in plain sight. There are so many levels to collective denial that engaging in any sort of authentic research or philosophical inquiry results in chasing ghosts and ancient clues down the infinite rabbit hole of never-ending conspiracies. Delusions are part of the 21st century paradigm’s duplicitous identity. How we deal with the lies and propaganda and the eventual outcome that we choose is what defines the spiritual war at hand.

Sanger’s outlook, by today’s standards is indelibly “racist”, and her statements make comments made by Donald Trump sound like quotes espoused by Nelson Mandela.

Consider:

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.”

– Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, 1939

“As the founder of America’s largest abortion chain, Margaret Sanger’s ideology for Planned Parenthood was cemented in eugenics, the belief and practice that aims to eliminate certain groups of people.”

“As a eugenicist, Sanger encouraged the sterilization of persons with less desirable qualities, and strongly encouraged the reproduction of groups with more desirable qualities. Sanger’s disdain for blacks, minority groups, and the diseased and disabled spawned the birth of an abortion corporation that profits off the killing of the weakest and most vulnerable. From its conception, Planned Parenthood was built upon the roots of exterminating individuals deemed “unfit” for the human family.”

Margaret Sanger sounds like Hitler’s primary mentor—to my ears at least.

THE FRUIT DOESN’T FALL FAR FROM THE TREE

The Gates father and son team—

“Bill Gates’ father is William H. Gates Sr., a Co-Founder of Preston Gates & Ellis (they had offices across the United States and China). A prominent banker and lawyer, William H. Gates Sr. was also deeply involved with politics and “philanthropy”. In the era before Roe v. Wade, he sat on the board of Margret Sanger’s Planned Parenthood. https://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript_gates.html

Why is that important?

The Roe v. Wade case legalized abortion, but almost nobody knows that legal abortion was a law formed by eugenicists, to “genetically improve” the population, by “reducing” the population.”

Billy Gates comes of age and administers the dictum for well-heeled crony elitists

Chattel slavery rises to the next phase where A.I.-directed programming regulates and maintains the optimal human population. Looking back at Billy Gates's rise to prominence as a selected icon for the technocracy’s long-range goals, hindsight is indeed 20/20. Over a 20 year period, Microsoft achieved a prominent position in the average citizen’s lifestyle choices. The corporate workplace was wired into the MS software update programs—or call it: the booster updates required to maintain a viral-free PC. Sound familiar?

Seems that the techno-geeks view any creature that breathes as computer software and hardware— especially humans and insects.[B.Gates involvement with financing a strain of mosquito that can deliver a vaccine, or bioweapon is noteworthy.]

Apple introduced the next phase of innocuous data collection in the guise of the iPhone. In this context, Apple kicked it up a notch, or ten with pocket computers so that A.I. was always present. As many are now aware—the next step is to implant brain chips in newborn humans. As the tech-geek at the WEF excitedly explained it: by 2030 we won’t need cell phones anymore because humans will become cell phones.

When I think of stellar tech advances I think of the DoD with its limitless funding(almost a Trillion$ allocated this year alone.) This raises a logical question in my purview of tech expansion and research:

Did the DoD use a demographic DNA template in order to target undesirable DNA types? Or was it just a means to selectively cultivate a more obedient slave class?…or none of the above—just a general collection of human DNA types for mere scientific curiosity. The PCR tests did indeed collect DNA samples on a global scale—with Iceland targeted as a mandated location where all Icelandic citizens agreed to get their DNA cataloged. Perhaps the search for the original Viking gene was the reason. What are the DNA sleuths searching for I wonder?

“CDC Admits COVID-19 Nasal Test Swabs Were Used To Collect DNA, Not Test For COVID”

source: https://thewashingtonstandard.com/cdc-admits-covid-19-nasal-test-swabs-were-used-to-collect-dna-not-test-for-covid/

PCR tests as a way to collect DNA samples in order to create a database? …Perhaps to design an even more deadly virus that will target selected DNA types?

The Rocker-Felons Agenda-’Shaping The Public Narrative’

“You’ve Come a Long Way Baby”

[*You've Come a Long Way Baby--TV Ad circa 1967]

In the seemingly innocuous guise of a cigarette ad for women, the 1960’s ‘Virginia Slims’ ad campaign was also an aspect of the corporate makeover of a woman’s role as home-maker and housewife. It was a message that stated that women had now come into their own as “equals” in a man’s man’s man’s world. The irony of it all—now tobacco giants could increase product sales by targeting women and selling the image of ‘sexy-independent-women-smoke.’ As it turned out—women smokers might also become the victims of lung cancer.

In another sense, Mad Ave’s campaign was in support of the Rockefeller agenda(unwitting or just profit mad?) to break up the family unit—and get those moms out there in the corporate workforce, and also in order to encourage female leadership. [statisticians were aware of the difference between women who tend to cooperate as “team-members” vs the Alpha males who tend to act more competitively in pursuit of the brass ring.] The economic advantage of removing stay-at-home moms from the family front line also meant an increase in the US citizen tax pool.

[I return to the creation of the FED/IRS creation (1913) again and again due to the allegiance with Davos as the West’s Central Bank HQ. Today we see how Davos has essentially taken over governments around the globe with their installed officers.]

Another aspect to the marketing angles of feminism: Two career couples often required two cars in order to get to the workplace—a boon for the auto industry; unless the husband or wife chose to carpool—an interesting aspect of financial politics. Jobs and transport—both adjuncts of the capitalist construct: ‘Usury on a treadmill.’

Corporations began the grooming process by hiring more women for executive positions, and the children(if there were any) were raised by daycare centers rather than their moms. We’ve witnessed an incremental trend towards a ‘new era 21st-century woman.’ The Media’s selected ‘woman role models’ possess as much competitive assertiveness as any man. Consider HRC, or Nancy Pelosi, or Kamala as just a few examples of women who behave more like men than women. To those of us who consider the “divine-feminine” a sacred aspect of human Being—the women in power positions within the Oligarchy seem driven to behave like men rather than connect with the essence of the ‘divine feminine’. They’re the newly engineered wo-man with testosterone in reserve.

In the 1970’s, a trend-setter and icon for the newly emancipated women workers was Gloria Steinem. She was at one time a Playboy bunny. Now that certain details re Hugh Hefner have emerged that indicate he was some type of CIA asset, Steinem appears as yet another useful stooge of the deep state.

Steinem operated on the political level, whereas Mary Tyler Moore was an icon in the realm of entertainment. Mary Tyler Moore represented the idealized contemporary working woman, and her BFF was Rhoda who played the sassy Jewish-tough-talking Bronx gal. I have considered the role of the sitcom in promoting the values of the establishment and toeing the line for the DC political machine. Whether one calls it “predictive programming”, or just plain “programming”, the hypnotic eye of TV brainwashed all of us who were spending hours watching the menu items that were selectively created for our entertainment, and distraction.

In the end, Gloria Steinem was much more than a mere feminist icon—her roots were very much a deep-state affair.

Henry Makow reports these details:

“Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA spying on Marxist students in Europe and disrupting their meetings. She became a media darling due to her CIA connections. MS Magazine, which she edited for many years was indirectly funded by the CIA. Steinem has tried to suppress this information, unearthed in the 1970´s by a radical feminist group called "Red Stockings." In 1979, Steinem and her powerful CIA-connected friends, Katharine Graham of the Washington Post and Ford Foundation President Franklin Thomas prevented Random House from publishing it in "Feminist Revolution." Nevertheless the story appeared in the "Village Voice" on May 21, 1979.”

[ed. note—Makow has critics who consider his research on Steinem as absurd. However, I’ll remain open-minded— it is a known fact that the Rockefeller Foundation funded the feminist movement—a movement that I view as superficial and disingenuous. The context of ‘divine feminine’ is sorely lacking within the so-called feminist movement— in my purview.]

Androgeny, Androids, and Technocracy

Mass media’s promotion of gay rights paved the way for the next phase—aka transgender inclusion, or gender confusion. Once again a social engineering platform. This form of PR has zero to do with tolerance or homophobia. In many ways, the media’s constant promotion of any form of sexual preference merely focuses attention on the most banal attributes of sexuality and has very little to do with the authentic values of human freedom or individual self-expression.

Makow makes sense in this overview of the feminist charade:

“Feminists relentlessly advance the idea that our inherent male and female characteristics, crucial to our development as human beings, are mere "stereotypes." This is a vicious calumny on all heterosexuals, 95% of the population. Talk about hate! Yet it is taught to children in elementary schools! It is echoed in the media. Lesbians like Rosie O´Donnell are advanced as role models.”

“All of this is calculated to create personal confusion and sow chaos among heterosexuals. As a result, millions of American males are emasculated and divorced from their relationship to family (the world and the future.) The American woman has been hoodwinked into investing herself in a mundane career instead of the timeless love of her husband and children. Many women have become temperamentally unfit to be wives and mothers. People, who are isolated and alone, stunted and love-starved, are easy to fool and manipulate. Without the healthy influence of two loving parents, so are their children.”

As the French say, with regard to the differences between the male and female sexes: Vive la différence!

A very Hetero-Pepé Le Pew and his female love interest. La Pew was first created in 1945.

HUMAN ENDGAME:

The controllers haven’t won…not yet.

“Globalization has peaked, and we are headed towards an era of de-globalization.”

The redistribution of resources and the wealth of sovereign nations will cause a massive shift and profound changes in geopolitical alliances.

In an optimal ‘resource management and distribution system’, working in alignment with an economy-of-scale timeline—real wealth will flow to those authentic community leaders who control the production of what people need most. “Wealth” will be redefined in the sense of authentic survival needs being served rather than arbitrary profit-based timelines. In the new paradigm model, collective well-being becomes the predominant guiding principle that ensures authentic “equity” based on true merit.

Thus, the banal bureaucratic ‘woke’ aphorisms are rendered obsolete and serve no purpose other than as a reminder of how language and political agenda’s can misconstrue and disable the legitimate problem-solving efforts of We the people.

“Specifically, this means deglobalization is bullish for food, commodities, and energy.”

A reference point of interest:

The Council on Foreign Relations was David Rockefeller’s Jewel.

David Rockefeller (1915-2017), joined the Council in 1941 and was appointed as a director in 1949.

“The Rockefellers have used their control (via over 200 foundations) of the Fortune 500 companies to hide the fact they are the real masterminds behind the war in Ukraine, the attempted vaccine genocide and much more. They are now being thrown under the bus.”

“To understand their involvement and their imminent defeat, let us start by looking at the members of the so-called regime of Joe Biden who belong to the Rockefeller-controlled Council on Foreign Relations”:

Kamala Harris, Vice President (CFR through family; Harvard; DLA Piper; Uber through family)
Antony Blinken, Secretary of State (CFR member; Harvard and Columbia; WestExec)
Janet Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury (CFR member; Yale and Harvard; Brookings)
Lloyd Austin, Secretary of Defense (CFR member; WestExec; Raytheon)
Linda Thomas-Greenfield, UN Ambassador (CFR member; Albright Stonebridge)
Cecilia Rouse, Council of Economic Advisors (CFR director; Princeton; Rowe Price)
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security (CFR member; Wilmer Hale)
Jake Sullivan, National Security Advisor (CFR author; Yale and Oxford; Carnegie)
Ron Klain, Chief of Staff (CFR through family; Harvard; O’Melveny and Meyers)
John Kerry, Special Envoy for Climate (CFR member; Yale)
Susan Rice, Chief of Domestic Council (CFR member; Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford)
William J. Burns, Director of Central Intelligence (CFR member; Oxford; Carnegie)
Kurt M. Campbell, Indo-Pacific Tsar (CFR member; Harvard and Oxford; Asia Group)
Thomas Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture (CFR member; Dairy Export Council)
Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce (CFR member; Oxford; Point Judith Capital)
Eric S. Lander, Director of Office of Science and Technology (CFR member; Harvard)
Jeffery Zients, Counselor to the President (CFR member; Cranemere)

https://monthlyreview.org/2021/05/01/the-council-on-foreign-relations-the-biden-team-and-key-policy-outcomes/

“The very first act of the “Biden” regime was to protect Rockefeller oil interests by canceling the Keystone Pipeline which would have allowed the American people access to reliable oil supplies not controlled by the Rockefellers.”

“The war in Ukraine as well can be seen as a Rockefeller attempt to force the Europeans to buy oil and gas from them and not from the Russians.”—B.Fulford

The narrative web continues to dazzle and baffle we humans as layer after layer of deception and subterfuge are revealed as mere distractions and delusion.

We’ll need to create an ending to this movie on par with the Truman Show!

Let us pray for a global debt jubilee and the beginning of a golden era!

pax

eScapeGoats & Digital Realities

Discussion about this post