Careful what you believe, and what words are uttered in a free-minded moment of self-expression.
One must be careful when criticizing Macron, Zelensky, the Biden(s), or Hussein. Some criminals cannot be judged for crimes against humanity. The critics need to be censored and corrected for “free-thought.” Any dissident’s critical judgements are verboten in the socially-engineered realm of elite sponsored “rules” dictating proper social order.
I sometimes offer a comment (under a pseudonym) on the X platform, and have never used expletives, or frightening horror show scenarios (when using the word: guillotine.)
I have rarely accused the Demonrats of Satanic rituals and/or “nazi” tactics. I avoid certain words, knowing full well what might be perceived as nasty-speech, and activate the AI-bot police. I also strive to avoid circular arguments. That’s the gist for my X commentary parameters.
I was censored recently. This is what a warning notice looks like (X alias removed by moi):
I violated the “X Rules.”
[update-June 12th: I was in the doghouse closer to three days rather than 12 hours. I presume this was due to my stubborn disregard in obeying the demand to remove the ‘offensive’ comment re ‘what we should do to Wef-criminals’ (basically suggesting the same punishments the Nuremberg trials doled out for crimes against humanity after WW2. Is this a ‘hateful’ thing to suggest? …hmmm.) I dutifully removed the offensive comment and Lo!… I was able to post comments once again…for about 10 minutes. I was careful to use terms and contextual nuances that I considered to be more sophisticated forms of wit and snarkisms…to no avail. My comments are now deemed as “private”…and can no longer do harm to the woke darlings out there who are musch too sensitive to engage in adult debate. Alas…AI filters are becoming most sophisticated!]
The red flag is the “Arkose” challenge.
Hmmm… real people vs artificial bots.
But wait…doesn’t Musk support the idea of A.I. as a useful bot tool? And what if a person wishes to avoid being spied on by the usual deep dark state, just in case a journo-observer’s POV might be interpreted as “anti-establishment”; and using an alias or pseudonym in order to thwart the A.I. spy mechanism. Is there no escaping the all-seeing-AI?
Careful what you say…
Counter-argument:
“Yes Riki, however—perhaps Musk is also trying to weed out the ‘bad actors with aliases’ who are spreading contentious commentary, and perhaps spreading divisive political propaganda…Perhaps he’s preventing the Russians from interfering in our elections.”
Riki: “And?…therefore— spy vs spy vs spy vs spy creates a realm of paranoia and onerous expectations controlled by some type of Big Brother mechanism in perpetuity. Isn’t this akin to perpetuating a prisoner-complex and victim state of mind?…Isn’t this way of living counter to living in a state of blessed gratitude and affinity with our fellow human beings?”
“Aye, Riki—there’s the rub. Freedom requires vigilant security and a wary sense of readiness—even if censorship must be used to enforce desirable behavioral conduct codes. Truth is always found in paradox. Imperfection is assured regardless of our best intentions. Besides, AI is a fabulous investment opportunity!…Don’t get left behind.”
Riki: ho hum…
[update-June 11th, 2024…more than twelve hours has passed and I’m still not allowed to access or post on Twitter]
And I had to pass the test!
Passing the test accomplished nothing (on my end.)
I posted this comment in notes-
end update…
Conclusion—
When in doubt it’s best to consult an oracle.
I’ll choose Lily Tomlin:
All for now…
Blessings!