Regarding the National Guard, is it not possible for this administration to declare a national emergency and deny us the opportunity to vote? That is what I think of first when I read about it, not a return to law and order but a march towards the end of our country.
The recent call to bring the Natl Guard to make NYC subways safe is a sticky wicket. Owen Shroyer's report on Info Wars last night brought up a range of questions re 'safety/security vs freedoms and civil liberties'--in light of the Guard's current engagement in NYC. Could be that NYC is a Beta test. Re the 'end of the US of A', the detail I keep coming back to has to do with the creation of two governments and two separate versions of history: American History and US History. The US corporation was formed in 1871, and I realize that Wikipedia and Snopes etc will deny that this is a historical fact. However, the sources I listen to and read tell us that the US corporation was defunct by 2016. One narrative goes like this: we will need military intervention in order to restore the "Constitutional Republic." Considering the performance of the DOJ of late, military tribunals would make sense, as long as the 'real' traitors stood trial. The Babel syndrome infects the body politic, however; and we have too many people who get hoodwinked by the charlatans who are using terms like "democracy" and "sustainability"--all of it designed to mask the con artist's thievery in the District of Corruption. Word up! ...reActivating the Constitution lis ong overdue.
And lest you think the conservatives are any less evil than the so-called leftists, let me disabuse you of that fact. They have done NOTHING - I repeat - NOTHING to stop the UN and WHO Agenda to end life as we know it.
As some patriots have stated (in solidarity--with the farmers in Europe and truckers in Canada)...We are the 'White Hats.' We outnumber Klaus and his goons.
Conservatives you mean or freedom fighters? We're not all conservative but there are a lot of former lefties who retained the ability to think critically, who find themselves wandering around with you all. I was referring to politicians though - they're all on the same side, no matter what colour their neckties.
Yes. Which is why Roseanne Barr threw her hat in the ring and ran for president back in 2012. As she stated, she didn't like either party. I believe that most folks with some sense of history and political process have realized that we have a 'corporate-duopoly.' Ike warned Americans of the MIC problem way back in 1961--and this problem has only become more twisted. What I would add to the dialog re money & power has to do with the lack of accountability with the FED, and the DoD. Trillions of dollars have gone missing over the years.According to Catherine Austin Fitts the amount of missing moolah is somewhere in the range of $21-$90 Tril. The managers we call representatives are obviously too compromised to work for We the People. There have been exceptions of course. Ron Paul has been trying to get the FED to open its books for approx 30 years. The DC Beast operates on its own schedules and continues to launder the dirty money. Will 1776's Tea Tax revolt make a reappearance one might wonder...?
Once upon a time when liberals were "classic" (before "neo-liberalism") and had not yet morphed into the bastard child it is today--many of us Americans considered Canada as a refuge from the tiresome DC snake pit. How far we've come, eh? Justin Castrudeau just won't accept liberty and freedom as intrinsic to a healthy society and a celebration of humanity. He and all the other Weffers have to go!...ASAP!
"...referring to trans exclusionary radical feminism, an anti-trans section of radical feminism." No Riki TIki Tavi - radical feminists are not anti-trans. Trans whacktavists call us TERFS because they are liars and twist the truth about everything so as to portray themselves as victims rather than the perpetrators they are. Radical feminism is true feminism - where women's rights and safety and freedom from male violence is the top of the list - it's liberation politics. Obviously that extends to not allowing transsexuals and other sexually perverse men to steal the title of woman, girl, mother, etc. and all the violations of truth and respect that go along with larping as women. No man is or will ever be a woman. We know transsexuals who have respect for women and understand their "rights" end where women's rights begin. They are not out on the front lines beating up women, stealing women's awards and titles and perving on little girls in changing rooms - those guys are straight men playing their sexual perverse boundary crushing games and we know it. True transsexuals understand they have emotional/mental issues and wouldn't dream of DEMANDING people bow down to their so-called "rights" to force people to lie and sacrifice their own and their childrens' safety to an agenda that has no respect for human rights. Trans people all have the same rights as everyone else, the activists want special rights and radical feminists are here to stick a pin in that bubble. Radical feminists know how to say no to men trying to bust up boundaries that are there for our safety. That's the long and the short of it and they really, really, really don't like that!
That's a very heartfelt response to Dave Chappelle's defense of gender as an organic and natural state of affairs here on Earth. I hear you re the political agendas --whether Left/Right (two wings on the same bird), Neo-Con, or Radical 'whatever'...I have always been sympathetic towards Roseanne Barr because she was dealing with the H'wood mafia (men and women of power in the entertainment matrix). As for the Feminist movement that got a yuuuge push in the late 60's and 70's--Rockefeller funded this movement in order to get women out of the house and break up families, and collect more taxable income. That detail was revealed by David (the younger Rockefelller) in the Aaaron Russo doc: "From Freedom to Fascism." Moloch's deviltry has created too many deceptions to get into in one article. As a valuable point of discernment (so we don't get too far off track) we need to be crystal clear re the Technocracy and Techno-fascism that is polluting the socio-eco-financial sphere. The ESG standards etc have zero to do with gender rights or any other polarizing nonsense; but they are designed to keep the money rolling into the coffers of BANK and maintain the social dis-order of the collapsing 'pirate' paradigm. I appreciate your point of view. Thanks for the reply!
Epic post!!!! Thanks so much
Regarding the National Guard, is it not possible for this administration to declare a national emergency and deny us the opportunity to vote? That is what I think of first when I read about it, not a return to law and order but a march towards the end of our country.
The recent call to bring the Natl Guard to make NYC subways safe is a sticky wicket. Owen Shroyer's report on Info Wars last night brought up a range of questions re 'safety/security vs freedoms and civil liberties'--in light of the Guard's current engagement in NYC. Could be that NYC is a Beta test. Re the 'end of the US of A', the detail I keep coming back to has to do with the creation of two governments and two separate versions of history: American History and US History. The US corporation was formed in 1871, and I realize that Wikipedia and Snopes etc will deny that this is a historical fact. However, the sources I listen to and read tell us that the US corporation was defunct by 2016. One narrative goes like this: we will need military intervention in order to restore the "Constitutional Republic." Considering the performance of the DOJ of late, military tribunals would make sense, as long as the 'real' traitors stood trial. The Babel syndrome infects the body politic, however; and we have too many people who get hoodwinked by the charlatans who are using terms like "democracy" and "sustainability"--all of it designed to mask the con artist's thievery in the District of Corruption. Word up! ...reActivating the Constitution lis ong overdue.
And lest you think the conservatives are any less evil than the so-called leftists, let me disabuse you of that fact. They have done NOTHING - I repeat - NOTHING to stop the UN and WHO Agenda to end life as we know it.
As some patriots have stated (in solidarity--with the farmers in Europe and truckers in Canada)...We are the 'White Hats.' We outnumber Klaus and his goons.
Conservatives you mean or freedom fighters? We're not all conservative but there are a lot of former lefties who retained the ability to think critically, who find themselves wandering around with you all. I was referring to politicians though - they're all on the same side, no matter what colour their neckties.
Yes. Which is why Roseanne Barr threw her hat in the ring and ran for president back in 2012. As she stated, she didn't like either party. I believe that most folks with some sense of history and political process have realized that we have a 'corporate-duopoly.' Ike warned Americans of the MIC problem way back in 1961--and this problem has only become more twisted. What I would add to the dialog re money & power has to do with the lack of accountability with the FED, and the DoD. Trillions of dollars have gone missing over the years.According to Catherine Austin Fitts the amount of missing moolah is somewhere in the range of $21-$90 Tril. The managers we call representatives are obviously too compromised to work for We the People. There have been exceptions of course. Ron Paul has been trying to get the FED to open its books for approx 30 years. The DC Beast operates on its own schedules and continues to launder the dirty money. Will 1776's Tea Tax revolt make a reappearance one might wonder...?
Sounds like we're on the same page Riki. I'm in Tranada btw - Canada, the transing children capital of the world.
Once upon a time when liberals were "classic" (before "neo-liberalism") and had not yet morphed into the bastard child it is today--many of us Americans considered Canada as a refuge from the tiresome DC snake pit. How far we've come, eh? Justin Castrudeau just won't accept liberty and freedom as intrinsic to a healthy society and a celebration of humanity. He and all the other Weffers have to go!...ASAP!
Yeah, it's pretty scary here actually.
"...referring to trans exclusionary radical feminism, an anti-trans section of radical feminism." No Riki TIki Tavi - radical feminists are not anti-trans. Trans whacktavists call us TERFS because they are liars and twist the truth about everything so as to portray themselves as victims rather than the perpetrators they are. Radical feminism is true feminism - where women's rights and safety and freedom from male violence is the top of the list - it's liberation politics. Obviously that extends to not allowing transsexuals and other sexually perverse men to steal the title of woman, girl, mother, etc. and all the violations of truth and respect that go along with larping as women. No man is or will ever be a woman. We know transsexuals who have respect for women and understand their "rights" end where women's rights begin. They are not out on the front lines beating up women, stealing women's awards and titles and perving on little girls in changing rooms - those guys are straight men playing their sexual perverse boundary crushing games and we know it. True transsexuals understand they have emotional/mental issues and wouldn't dream of DEMANDING people bow down to their so-called "rights" to force people to lie and sacrifice their own and their childrens' safety to an agenda that has no respect for human rights. Trans people all have the same rights as everyone else, the activists want special rights and radical feminists are here to stick a pin in that bubble. Radical feminists know how to say no to men trying to bust up boundaries that are there for our safety. That's the long and the short of it and they really, really, really don't like that!
That's a very heartfelt response to Dave Chappelle's defense of gender as an organic and natural state of affairs here on Earth. I hear you re the political agendas --whether Left/Right (two wings on the same bird), Neo-Con, or Radical 'whatever'...I have always been sympathetic towards Roseanne Barr because she was dealing with the H'wood mafia (men and women of power in the entertainment matrix). As for the Feminist movement that got a yuuuge push in the late 60's and 70's--Rockefeller funded this movement in order to get women out of the house and break up families, and collect more taxable income. That detail was revealed by David (the younger Rockefelller) in the Aaaron Russo doc: "From Freedom to Fascism." Moloch's deviltry has created too many deceptions to get into in one article. As a valuable point of discernment (so we don't get too far off track) we need to be crystal clear re the Technocracy and Techno-fascism that is polluting the socio-eco-financial sphere. The ESG standards etc have zero to do with gender rights or any other polarizing nonsense; but they are designed to keep the money rolling into the coffers of BANK and maintain the social dis-order of the collapsing 'pirate' paradigm. I appreciate your point of view. Thanks for the reply!